Thank you Mark!

On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hi,

Yes, that's right.

All the best,
Mark


On 5 Aug 2017, at 09:13, Chirag Limbachia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Anderson, 

Thank you for your response. So just to be clear. If the event-related design has two stimuli types, I can add two EVs and set two contrasts ([1 0] and [0 1]) to get activation due to each EV (each stimulus type in the event-related design). Is this what you mean? I appreciate your help.

Thank you

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 4, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Anderson M. Winkler <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi Chirag,

Yes, just add to the design an EV with those events. I assume the random rest events were random for the subject, but ideally you'd know when they happened.

All the best,

Anderson


On 4 August 2017 at 18:12, Chirag Limbachia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
FSL Experts,

For a rapid event-related design in which there are two types of stimuli and also random rest events, is it possible to model response solely for one stimulus type? If yes, how?

Cheers!

Sent from my iPhone