 |
 |
now an example I could perhaps get some aged teeth into cheers P
grumpy
[log in to unmask]">Don't understand the below Luke, particularly the 'but only as speech'. We need an example.
On 11 Aug 2017, at 18:35, Luke wrote:
My aim is to quote based on theory and not novelty. I begin by claiming that, due to anxiety, I write poems which could be read as ambiguous New Critical wholes, but only as speech. I show how this means that as speech they can resolve into a single moment with a shifting meaning. I then add that this can be written as two layers of narrative, meaning that in my poems quotation can appear both as reified speech and not. Quotation then is superficially worked into the reified present moment, and so novel, while at the same time antagonistic with that.