 |
 |
Adding one more column is not the problem. I think though every sites should do it uniformly. Instead everyone started from a common table long time ago and then started to add/remove their own. cheers alessandra On 17/07/2017 16:11, Stephen Jones wrote: > I've reviewed the document, and it's not as bad as I thought. In fact, > it's got good data in it, mostly. > > But I think the problem is that, although the data for memPerSlot is > "there", it has to be computed by talking totalMem and dividing it by > "slots" and even worse, slots can only be determined by taking > totalHs06 and dividing it by hs06PerSlot. That's easy in a > spreadsheet, but doing that to all 300 rows in the Wiki table would be > a serious PITA. That's a problem. > > I've got an application to do this work, but I'd have to load the data > into it (and it's not exactly in JSON format!) I'll think about it. > > Cheers, > > Ste > > > > > > > > On 17/07/17 15:49, Alessandra Forti wrote: >> On 17/07/2017 15:34, Stephen Jones wrote: >>> On 17/07/17 15:14, Alessandra Forti wrote: >>>> I've updated Manchester to reflect the number of slots rather than >>>> HT (HT info is incorporated in the first column anyway). Memory is >>>> per node. >>>> >>> Looking at the fields now .... >>> >>> I can see you have given "totalHs06" and "hs06PerCore" (ignoring >>> obsolete "Per HW Thread"). >>> >>> From that, I can tell that you have a "Dual 6 cores x 2 HTs, Intel >>> X5650 @ 2.67GHz". >>> >>> You measured that hardware and got 211.62 totalHs06. Since you say >>> you had 17.64 hs06PerCore, I can compute that you use 12 >>> instancesOfTheBenchmark/slots/threads/whatever. >>> >>> Fine, it's all there. If you used those nodes for VAC, you might >>> (for example) have to repeat the calibration with 10 x >>> instancesOfTheBenchmark (because VAC needs more memory per job.) >>> >>> So you have given enough information to get it all (in my view, it >>> would be simpler to give the totalHS06 and the >>> instancesOfTheBenchmark. But it makes no odds, really.) >> that's what is there now, you must still have the old page. >> >> cheers >> alessandra >> >>> >>> Note: At Liverpool, I actually give all three, but only two are needed. >>> >>> So, do we agree - totalHs06 and hs06PerCore should be fields, and >>> the "slots used" (instancesOfTheBenchmark) can be determined >>> arithmetically? Let me know _before_ I change the table. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> >> > -- Respect is a rational process. \\// Fatti non foste a viver come bruti, ma per seguir virtute e canoscenza(Dante) For Ur-Fascism, disagreement is treason. (U. Eco) But but but her emails... covfefe!