 |
 |
Nice work Zosia and thanks for sharing. One short observation: The Review decision tree model identifies 3 data types (3rd Party Data, 3rd Party Software, Derived Data) that flow to the 'Do Not Publish' action. Is a dependency where 3rd party assets are available or derived under an open licence worth including in the model? I don't see any impediment to publication where this has been enabled by the data creator. Regards, Garret McMahon On 21 July 2017 at 20:42, Claire Austin <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hello Zosia, > > I would be very interested in seeing the flow charts. In the meantime, > could the guideline for what data to publish simply be something along the > lines of: all data, metadata, and computer code needed to reproduce the > research? > > Claire > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jul 21, 2017, at 9:22 AM, Lake, Sherry Heitchew (sah) <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > Hi Zosia, > > > > I would love to see what you have drafted. > > > > This could be a hard task, as I think publishers and funding agencies each > have a different take on what data needs to be published (or shared). So a > flowchart might have to take into consideration at least three competing > entities: publisher (journal policies), funding agencies (sharing > policies), disciplines (community standards) in addition to the type of > data (sensitive or not sensitive – data that needs to be de-identified, > etc.) > > > > -- > > Sherry Lake > > > > *Sherry Lake *| Scholarly Repository Librarian | University of Virginia > Library <http://library.virginia.edu> | [log in to unmask] | 434.924.6730 > | @shLakeUVA <https://twitter.com/shlakeuva> | Alderman Library, 160 N. > McCormick Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903 | Alderman 563 | LinkedIn > Profile <https://www.linkedin.com/in/shlakeuva> | “Keeper of the > Dataverse" > > > > On 7/21/17, 5:06 AM, "Research Data Management discussion list on behalf > of Zosia Beckles" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > Hi all > > > > We've had a lot of requests for guidelines on which data should be > published to support different types of paper in different disciplines. > Has anyone else produced guidance in this level of detail? > > > > I've drafted some preliminary flowcharts for science/engineering (let > me know if you'd like to see these) but I'd be interested to see how other > institutions have handled this. I'll summarise any responses for the list. > > > > Thanks > > > > Zosia > > -- > > Zosia Beckles MCLIP > > Research Data Librarian > > Research Data Service > > Library Services > > University of Bristol > > 40 Berkeley Square > > Bristol BS8 1HU > > Tel: +44 (0) 117 39 41076 > > Email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask] > <[log in to unmask]>> > > > > A top 3 UK university with leading employers (2017) > > A top 5 UK university for research (2014 REF) > > A world top 50 university (QS Ranking 2016) > > > > [https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/ > UZMf4DoF94EkAjL9r37KowTnyhjTZn1rP4Zd2iJYiqXd9RZGD4Eli_ > qcYPWCNWY6I7ZxaM3Vx8Vatxt0G7sFPYrohbRya8cKvawmgJ7BSg=s0-d- > e1-ft#http://data.blogs.ilrt.org/files/2014/12/twitter-logo.png]< > https://twitter.com/databris/>Follow us @databris<https://twitter.com/ > databris/> > > > > -- 10 Ard Righ Place Arbour Hill Dublin Ireland D07 W7K