An interesting philosophical question, Jeremy. Can you not turn to your colleagues, Andrew Moore et al (http://www.change-pain.co.uk/about-change-pain/about-our-advisory-panel/)
who have spent many years with this conundrum, I expect.
Ian
K IAN JOHNSON
SENIOR DIRECTOR
T: +44 1625 624048 |M: +44 7725 335342
www.mccannhealth.com/consulting
@CMH_McCann
19-21 King Edward Street, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 1AQ
From: Evidence based health (EBH) [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Jeremy Howick
Sent: 19 July 2017 12:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: pain: psychological or physical
Dear List Members,
Within the context of a trial or systematic review, is change in pain (for example with a visual analog scale): (a) physical outcome, (b) psychological outcome,
or (c) both.neither?
I am aware that many causes of pain (such as bumping my head into a low door frame) are purely physical. What I am interested in is whether pain as an outcome measured
by a visual analog scale itself is physical, psychological, or both/neither.
I’m specifically interested in what the scientific consensus is or, better, whether there is evidence of some kind that could resolve this.
Thanks in advance,
Jeremy
T: +44 (0)1865 289 258 E:
[log in to unmask]
http://www.phc.ox.ac.uk/team/jeremy-howick
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford
Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive this message for the intended recipient), you may not use, copy, disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message. Thank you very much.