 |
 |
Dear all, Just a quick question. (If responses are useful, I’ll compile and summarize the answers.) We all have to work with the digital editorial systems of academic journals. As authors who submit articles and revised versions of articles, as reviewers to provide constructive comments, and as editors to select articles and compile issues. These editorial systems also have features to make e-mail correspondence between authors and editors, and reviewers and editors possible. Some can do even more. There are several different of these ‘Editorial Management systems'. My questions: In your experience, have you come across a system that was really well designed? I’m looking for the normal usability criteria (effective, efficient, and attractive?)? [I’m specifically searching for software that is a pleasure to work with: well designed, transparent, user friendly, developed to aid authors/reviewers/editors, etc.] Please send all suggestions (preferably stating if you’ve used it as an author, as a reviewer, or as an editor) to me directly: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Karel. [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]> Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design -----------------------------------------------------------------