 |
 |
Dear List
Just to correct David's language about risk levels...
The LQM/CIEH S4ULs are based on health criteria values that represent minimal risk for non threshold behaviour and negligible risk for threshold behaviour. The difference matters because background
intake and additivities are handled differently. Further details at:
http://www.lqm.co.uk/publications/s4ul/
As for Part 2A, there are the LQM/CIEH Dose Response Roadmaps that are specifically designed to help Local Authorities discern SPOSH. Further details at:
http://www.lqm.co.uk/DRR-what/
Warm Regards - Judith Nathanail
Land Quality Management Ltd.
The Sir Colin Campbell Building University of Nottingham Innovation Park
Triumph Road Nottingham NG7 2TU Tel: +44 (0)115
7484080 M: 07970843062 www.lqm.co.uk [log in to unmask]
This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient of this email and its attachments, you must take no action based upon them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Any views or opinions expressed
are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Land Quality Management Ltd. No employee or agent is authorised to enter into any contractual agreement with another party by e-mail. The recipient should check this email and any attachments
for the presence of viruses. Land Quality Management Ltd accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
Join our mailing list
http://eepurl.com/bbAD6L
-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David E Jackson
Sent: 28 June 2017 09:58
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: ATRISKsoil Updates
Dear List,
How do these relate to "minimal risk" S4ULs?
Are they still based on LLTC? and therefore for Part 2A uses only?
Cheers David E Jackson