 |
 |
We had the Tritek CrystalPro and now have two Formulatrix RI-1000s. We're very happy with what we have now, and though I don't know what improvements Tritek has made since the version we owned, at the time we found their software clunky, imaging not the best or most consistent, and automation challenging. It took a great deal of time to make it work marginally. The formulatrix systems on the other hand have been robust and their support excellent (we pay for annual software support but let the hardware support go). They're easy to run and maintain. Chris Dr Christopher A Waddling Crystallography Facility Manager Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics University of California, San Francisco Genentech Hall, Box 2140 600 16th St., S126C San Francisco, CA 94143 415-476-8288 > On Jun 30, 2017, at 5:36 AM, Sebastiano Pasqualato <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > Dear all, > we are in the process of considering the purchase of a new Crystal Imager. > > So far, we have been considering the Formulatrix Rock Imager 182 and the TriTek Crystal Pro HT. > I would be extremely grateful to anyone who could provide me: > > - feedback and user experience (positive/negative) on those instruments; > - information on other instruments you would suggest. > > Thank you very much in advance, > wishing you a pleasant weekend, > best regards, > ciao, > S > > > > -- > Sebastiano Pasqualato, PhD > Crystallography Unit > Department of Experimental Oncology > European Institute of Oncology > IFOM-IEO Campus > via Adamello, 16 > 20139 - Milano > Italy > > tel +39 02 9437 5167 > fax +39 02 9437 5990 > web http://is.gd/IEOXtalUnit > > _______________________________________________ > phenixbb mailing list > [log in to unmask] > http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > Unsubscribe: [log in to unmask]