 |
 |
Hi Alessandra/All, > Whose giving feedback from the UK? To the EGI proposal I will. It came up at an EGI ops meeting yesterday that clashed with our PMB, so I had not seen it when it was proposed. > > 5 days for short interventions is a bad idea. > > WLCG proposal on page 3 makes more sense. Indeed. We backed this WLCG discussion in January: https://indico.cern.ch/event/607744/contributions/2449767/subcontributions/218703/attachments/1402467/2141097/LongDowntimes-170126.pdf and at the ops coordination meeting. You’ll remember from my GridPP bulletin update on 2nd May that EGI were considering to simply adopt the WLCG changes. It seems someone has subsequently not thought things through for the patching case, but sites (as Alistair and other just commented) are likely to do these (or take the site offline) unscheduled anyway. Jeremy > On 16/05/2017 12:00, Linda Cornwall wrote: >> I think it was a proposal only. I don't think it has been decided. >> >> It does not make sense to give 5 days notice if they want to go down to fix vulnerabilities, in fact it's a bad idea, so I don't think it makes sense. >> >> Linda. >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB- >>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Gronbech >>> Sent: 16 May 2017 11:56 >>> To: [log in to unmask] >>> Subject: Down time declarations >>> >>> I noticed that there is a proposal to change the downtime declaration to 5 days >>> before and intervention from 24 hours. >>> See slide 6 of >>> https://indico.egi.eu/indico/event/3237/contribution/4/material/slides/0.pdf >>> >>> This would mean interventions declared less than 5 days in advance will be >>> considered unscheduled. >>> I'm not sure if this has been approved yet though. >>> >>> Cheers Pete >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Peter Gronbech GridPP Project Manager Tel No. : 01865 273389 >>> >>> Department of Particle Physics, >>> University of Oxford, >>> Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK E-mail : [log in to unmask] >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > Respect is a rational process. \\// > Fatti non foste a viver come bruti, ma per seguir virtute e canoscenza(Dante) > For Ur-Fascism, disagreement is treason. (U. Eco) > But but but her emails... (Anonymous)