Is this related to how reports are displayed and processed in the receiving clinical system? Or to activity analysis?

I’m very interested in the former: IMNSHO GPs are drowning in reports of investigations used for monitoring, and we need to change the whole process…

Jonathan


On 17 May 2017, at 10:22, Shepherd, John <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Can anyone share their experience of applying separate request items for HbA1c in respect of diagnosis or monitoring?
Our requesting is all done remotely (electronic) and it would rely on the requestor making the correct choice.
 
Also can anyone share any evidence of improving clinical intervention by appending automatically generated report comments to cumulative HbA1c results?
 
I imagine the latter scenario is dependent on the first being done reliably.
 

------ACB discussion List Information-------- This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical community working in clinical biochemistry. Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and they are responsible for all message content. ACB Web Site http://www.acb.org.uk Green Laboratories Work http://www.laboratorymedicine.nhs.uk List Archives http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html List Instructions (How to leave etc.) http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/