 |
 |
I guess you are talking about labelling significant clusters tfce_corrp_stat1 and tfce_corrp_stat2, not different ways of generating those stats images. As long as the atlas in the software you were referring is also in MNI52 standard space, this should be fine. The total number of significant voxels should be the same, no matter which atlas was used for labelling. The number of significant voxels within each brain region could be slightly different which depends on which atlas you use. On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:32 AM, SUBSCRIBE FSL Shufei Zhang < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > Dear All, > I am new with FSL and met a problem when reporting the results. > Because I want to report the results of TBSS through the atlas > different from the bulit-in atlas of FSL. I used another software to report > it. My problems are described below. > Is it permittable? when I used another software to locate the results > in the atlas and the number of two-significant-cluster voxels were aboult > 5000 but only the 227 voxels significant at the tfce_corrp_stat2 were found > by fslstats. I know tbss_skeleton was used to represent local maximal and > it is right to report the results directly by cluster terminal? > Thanks for your petience and if I can not describe clearly, contact > me plz. I really appreciate FSL software that helps me a lot in DTI data > analysis. > > > > > > > Yours:Shufei Zhang >