I don't understand. There seems, at least to me, no relation between the
skull and the reconstructed face. (Skull seems to have very broad
cheekbones, not reproduced in the face.)
African? Why not? Must have been trade between North Africa and the East
coast of the Mediterranean.
Marika
From: The Black and Asian Studies Association [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of arthur torrington
Sent: 16 March 2017 10:11
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: AN ORIGINAL PALESTINIAN ?
FOR INFORMATION ONLY
I visited a new gallery at the British Museum recently and took photos (with
a phone camera) of the skull said to be of a 9,500 year old Jordanian man.
The modern reconstruction of the skull does look like an African.
But, nowhere is the gallery is there a mention of his being African .
Evidence of the original Palestinian?
