Daniel
This is very helpful.
Is there a timetable for the restructure, new version and API of DMP Online? I would like to further customise what we offer at Stirling but if the version is going to change this semester I would hold off.
Thanks
Lisa
Lisa Haddow
Research and Scholarly Communications Manager
Information Services
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0072-053X
T: 01786 467232
A: S7, Lower Studies
Corridor,Stirling University Library,University of Stirling,Stirling FK9 4LA
Open Access – REF2020
From April 2016, to be eligible for submission to REF2020, all peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers must have been deposited
in STORRE via
RMS within 3 months of acceptance, further detail as are available
here. For further information about Open Access, please see our
Open Access policy, OA web pages or contact the
Open Access Team or the
repository librarian
From: Research Data Management discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Van Strien, Daniel
Sent: 11 January 2017 12:35
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Customised version of DMPOnline - feedback
Hi all,
Many thanks to all the people who got in touch to offer feedback/suggestions/advice on using a customised version of DMPOnline. As promised here is a summary of the feedback I got.
I got a relatively small number of responses from institutions using a customised version of DMPOnline. It is likely I didn’t hear from everyone using a customised/non-customised version of DMPOnline. I also had some communication from
people not using currently using a customised version or pointing researchers to the ‘standard’ DCC version of DMPOnline. The DCC provided some useful input too.
Positive feedback
-
a quick way to set up a Data Management platform which links researchers to funder and institutional support
-
possible to do branding to make platform look more institutional
-
Institutional ID authentication provides easier access for researchers
-
Relatively straightforward to setup
-
Institutional specific information and guidance embedded within the planning tool
-
Feedback from researchers – no complains, the occasional positive comment
Negative
-
Draft responses to questions not auto-saved
-
DMPOnline can get very slow when filing in templates with multiple questions
-
DMPOnline can be slow when training/accessing with large number of users
-
No spelling correction
-
Some difficulties carrying out customisation on the platform itself. Solved by copying and pasting guidance from outside the platform.
-
Currently not possible to customise stages for funder templates
Neutral
-
DCC guidance comprehensive so extra guidance might not be necessary.
-
Usage seems to be higher among PhDs and Masters students, senior researchers prefer to use Word.
-
All of the responses made clear that using DMPOnline was not a requirement for researchers
I also got some advice from the DCC about using a customised version of DMPOnline.
-
DCC are restructuring the database which will address DMPOnline slowing down with multiple users
-
Time consuming part of customisation might be deciding what local guidance and support to include. This was echoed by other responses from people planning to introduce a customised version of the tool in the future
-
An API is planned for future version which will allow plan details and statistics/integration into other systems.
-
Migration to the new version (DMPRoadmap) will be possible from current customisations.
As a result of this feedback and other discussions we are likely to go ahead with implementing a customised version of DMPOnline. We are currently working out a time frame for doing this but I will try and provide updates as we go along
if we run into any issues/have advice based on our experience.
Thanks again for all the feedback,
Daniel
Daniel van Strien
Research Data Support Officer