This is more useful, thanks. However I have not insinuated that you are using spam accounts.

Jo

(psci-com owner)

On 10 January 2017 at 13:22, SED Science Education <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Dear Jo,

We are very sorry that you insist on putting a bad light on the SED platform and trying to tarnish our reputation, which we take very seriously.

Your insinuation that we are using spam accounts, has no basis. There are no spam accounts. We have always received organic likes and follows.

In relation to who is behind this platform, we are a group of PhD graduates, scientists and researchers, from different countries, who have come up with this idea. We are currently working on this platform, without making any revenue, out of our own free time.

Finally, in relation to the articles, news and events we will be uploading on our platform, these will all be free of charge, for the time being, unless otherwise notified. We are not asking to have work done for us, but rather, we will be uploading and writing about the events, news and information ourselves. We are looking for people to contact us about any research or events they want us to publish about.

I hope this answers satisfactorily your questions.

Should you have any further questions, we would ask you to contact us privately over [log in to unmask]. 

Have a nice day,

SED  

SCIENCE EDUCATION

s: https://sedscienceeducation.wordpress.com

e: [log in to unmask]

Connect with us over: Facebook, LinkedIn & Twitter

The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. 

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Jo Brodie <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hmm. You've not answered my questions about who's behind it, or what you're offering contributors in terms of payments. To be honest my main 'red flag' warnings are that your July tweet has over 30 likes mostly from obviously spam accounts, and the people you're following from that account seem to be fairly random and irrelevant.

Until there's more clarity I'd also advise people to steer clear. I'm very happy to eat my words if and when this is resolved.

Jo (psci-com owner)

**********************************************************************

psci-com how-to: Once subscribed, send emails for the list to [log in to unmask]. If not subscribed, either subscribe here https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=psci-com or send requests for items to be posted on your behalf to [log in to unmask]uk

To unsubscribe (or silence messages while away) send an email (any subject) to [log in to unmask] with one of the following messages (ignoring text in brackets)

• signoff psci-com (to leave the list) • set psci-com nomail (to stop receiving messages while on holiday) • set psci-com mail (to resume getting messages)

Contact list owner at [log in to unmask]uk Small print and JISCMail acceptable use policy https://sites.google.com/site/pscicomjiscmail/the-small-print

**********************************************************************