 |
 |
Dear Dave 'Geddit' what a sweet term of endearment so you say your insults were was not insults ??- so you say have a good day P saddened On 23/01/2017 07:57, David Bircumshaw wrote: > Patrick the point of the post was to demonstrate a similar level of > distortion to that 'anti-Stratfordians' inflict upon Shakespeare. Did > you not understand that? > > I have no idea what you work as an architect was like, that wasn't the > point. The post WASN'T about you, it was emulating the methods of > distortion used by writers upon the 'Authorship question'. Geddit? > > On 23 January 2017 at 07:26, Patrick McManus > <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > wrote: > > Dear Dave I am sad that you attack me for the crime of being an > architect > > -I am proud of my career was involved in providing hundreds of > > homes in England and Denmark -which I consider to be worthwhile > > I do not see myself as you describe as a 'wrecker', 'philistine' > or 'soulless zombie' > > P > > > On 21/01/2017 14:14, David Bircumshaw wrote: >> "note the typical use of 'P' as a signature by the alleged >> author, which, along with his semi-literate reading habits >> (readers will recall the infamous recommendation of 'Fifty Shades >> of Grey' as innovative literature) and his self-confessed former >> occupation as an 'architect' (in late twentieth/ early >> twenty-first century parlance a synonym for 'wrecker', >> 'philistine' or 'soulless zombie') which yet again support the >> case for the real presence behind his outpourings being the >> prototype AutoPoeticon R2D2, an early device from Fisons >> Laboratories of Loughborough." >> >> From 'The McManus Conspiracy' - Oldlewitte and Shine, Bangalore >> University Press, 2134 >> >> On 21 January 2017 at 09:27, Patrick McManus >> <[log in to unmask] >> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: >> >> not always????? cheers P >> >> * Willm Shakp >> * William Shaksper >> * Wm Shakspe >> * William Shakspere >> * Willm Shakspere >> * By me William Shakspeare >> * "Shakespeare" appears 71 times, while "Shakespere" >> appears second with 27 usages. These are followed by >> "Shakespear" (16); "Shakspeare" (13); "Shackspeare" (12) >> and "Shakspere" (8). There are also many other variations >> that appear in small numbers or as one-offs.^[6] >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spelling_of_Shakespeare%27s_name#cite_note-kath-6> >> >> >> >> On 20/01/2017 23:52, Peter Riley wrote: >>> As far as I'm concerned the works of Shakespeare were >>> written by a row of eleven letters. >>> >>> PR >> >> >> >> >> -- >> David Joseph Bircumshaw >> >> http://www.staplednapkin.org.uk/ >> <https://spectares-web.000webhostapp.com/> >> >> The Animal Subsides >> http://www.arrowheadpress.co.uk/books/animal.html >> <http://www.arrowheadpress.co.uk/books/animal.html> >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/david.bircumshaw >> <http://www.facebook.com/david.bircumshaw> >> Tumblr: http://zantikus.tumblr.com/ >> twitter: http://twitter.com/bucketshave >> blog: http://groggydays.blogspot.com/ >> <http://groggydays.blogspot.com/> > > > > > -- > David Joseph Bircumshaw >