 |
 |
Patrick the point of the post was to demonstrate a similar level of distortion to that 'anti-Stratfordians' inflict upon Shakespeare. Did you not understand that? I have no idea what you work as an architect was like, that wasn't the point. The post WASN'T about you, it was emulating the methods of distortion used by writers upon the 'Authorship question'. Geddit? On 23 January 2017 at 07:26, Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Dear Dave I am sad that you attack me for the crime of being an architect > > -I am proud of my career was involved in providing hundreds of > > homes in England and Denmark -which I consider to be worthwhile > > I do not see myself as you describe as a 'wrecker', 'philistine' or > 'soulless zombie' > > P > > On 21/01/2017 14:14, David Bircumshaw wrote: > > "note the typical use of 'P' as a signature by the alleged author, which, > along with his semi-literate reading habits (readers will recall the > infamous recommendation of 'Fifty Shades of Grey' as innovative literature) > and his self-confessed former occupation as an 'architect' (in late > twentieth/ early twenty-first century parlance a synonym for 'wrecker', > 'philistine' or 'soulless zombie') which yet again support the case for the > real presence behind his outpourings being the prototype AutoPoeticon R2D2, > an early device from Fisons Laboratories of Loughborough." > > From 'The McManus Conspiracy' - Oldlewitte and Shine, Bangalore University > Press, 2134 > > On 21 January 2017 at 09:27, Patrick McManus < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> not always????? cheers P >> >> - Willm Shakp >> - William Shaksper >> - Wm Shakspe >> - William Shakspere >> - Willm Shakspere >> - By me William Shakspeare >> - "Shakespeare" appears 71 times, while "Shakespere" appears second >> with 27 usages. These are followed by "Shakespear" (16); "Shakspeare" (13); >> "Shackspeare" (12) and "Shakspere" (8). There are also many other >> variations that appear in small numbers or as one-offs.[6] >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spelling_of_Shakespeare%27s_name#cite_note-kath-6> >> >> >> On 20/01/2017 23:52, Peter Riley wrote: >> >> As far as I'm concerned the works of Shakespeare were written by a row of >> eleven letters. >> >> PR >> >> >> > > > -- > David Joseph Bircumshaw > > http://www.staplednapkin.org.uk/ > <https://spectares-web.000webhostapp.com/> > > The Animal Subsides http://www.arrowheadpress.co.uk/books/animal.html > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/david.bircumshaw > Tumblr: http://zantikus.tumblr.com/ > twitter: http://twitter.com/bucketshave > blog: http://groggydays.blogspot.com/ > > > -- David Joseph Bircumshaw