 |
 |
I agree that his brand of capitalism is bad. But as i said, the alternative was possible war with Russia under Clinton. Having lived under bad capitalism since 1979 in the UK, it scares me less than nuclear war. ----------Original Message----------- Tim Allen wrote: Four years is a very long time in politics. All kinds of things could come up. And by the way, I have no sympathy for Clinton, none whatsoever - it's the ordinary American people I have sympathy for. As I said before, if this is the best their system can come up with then something is very wrong, but it's been wrong for nearly ever so what's new. The most powerful Capitalist country in the world can not provide for its own poor. This was always going to end badly at some point. That it ends with those poor (and they don't appear to me to be the 'most poor' either, about whom they don't seem to give a fuck) voting for a man who epitomises that capitalism is so bleakly funny and scary, and yet when you look at the ideology and daft stuff they've been fed from birth, it appears as plain as day.