Print

Print


Hi all,
in some way the original email didn't reach me, so I'm a bit late. I'm quite sure it is not human, the cusps are much too pronounced and the crown is too elongated. Morphologically it looks in my opinion quite similar to a lower right 3rd molar of a bear too, but Werner is right, it is too small for that. The only badger with a lower M2 I have lying around certainly looks different, less elongated with more like four cusps, but then it's a quite senile specimen. I find this most intriguing, I hope somebody comes up with a solution.

Rengert

 



Am 24.10.2016 um 09:11 schrieb MUELLER Werner:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">

Sorry to jump in so late.

Richard; the lower M3 of bear is far too large/long. Julia indicated it is about 8 mm, the one from bear is about 18-20 mm. I have 2.5 months and 9 months old bear cubs, I think I can exclude bear.

Then, just a thought: Lower M2 of badger. Does not fit completely with the specimens at hand, but if Julia could check the original tooth, might be worth a try,

cheers,

Vern

 

 

Description :
                        cid:image001.gif@01CB565B.F8B5AE60

Description :
                        cid:image002.gif@01CB565B.F8B5AE60

Description :
                        cid:image003.gif@01CB565B.F8B5AE60

Werner Müller
Laboratoire d'archéozoologie

Université de Neuchâtel

Av. de Bellevaux 51

CH-2000 Neuchâtel

Suisse

tel. +41-32-718 31 10

www.unine.ch/ia

 

 

De : Analysis of animal remains from archaeological sites [mailto:[log in to unmask]] De la part de Richard Wright
Envoyé : lundi 24 octobre 2016 02:15
À : [log in to unmask]
Objet : Re: [ZOOARCH] Friday tooth quiz

 

 Deb

I imagine the unerupted crowns of deciduous bear teeth are only a little less scarce than the proverbial hens' teeth.

However the illustrations here look promising, particularly the lowest left illustration.

https://wwwresearchgate.net/figure/284132836_fig4_Fig-4-Upper-and-lower-Ursus-etruscus-molars-VM10284-A-occlusal-A-1-lingual-A-2

Julia - you would do us a favour if you Dropboxed some more pictures of the tooth - in particular one looking down onto the occlusal surface.

Richard


----- Original Message -----

From:

[log in to unmask]

 

To:

<[log in to unmask]>

Cc:

<[log in to unmask]>

Sent:

Sat, 22 Oct 2016 22:40:06 -0600

Subject:

Re: [ZOOARCH] Friday tooth quiz


Richard, you are a careful worker. Happily we have textbooks to tell us
what unerupted baby teeth look like. However, now that you've made it
possible for me to see the images -- geez, I agree with your first
observation more strongly. Those cusps are pretty darned high and pointy!

I now think it's not a pig; cusps too high and the tooth is too fat and
wide for an inferior tooth of a pig. But somebody on this list suggested
"bear"....does anybody have a bear cub to compare to? I have adult bear
but no cubs. Just to make double sure if nothing else. -- Deb Bennett


>  I find that I was mistaken in my previous reply.
>
>  If this is a human unerupted deciduous mandibular molar then one
> should not expect to see developmental fissures between the cusps.
>
> Scheuer and Black (in _Developmental Juvenile Osteology_ page 156-157)
> cite Kraus and Jordan's 1965 book _The Human Dentition Before Birth_.
>
> Scheur and Black write: "The mandibular molars lack the characteristic
> pattern of grooves and pits, which only develop with later postnatal
> deposition of enamel."
>
> So I think it is back to considering the crown to be human.
>
> I don't have Kraus and Jordan's book, but a snippet I read on Google
> Books starts, but does not complete, a description of the crown of
> what might be the tooth in question.
>
> One lives and learns - thanks in part to ZOOARCH!
>
> Richard
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Julia Cussans"
> To:
> Cc:
> Sent:Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:18:00 +0100
> Subject:[ZOOARCH] Friday tooth quiz
>
> Hello All,
>
> I would be interested to see your thoughts on this tooth. It comes
> from a multi-phase henge site in Hertfordshire, UK. I have a couple of
> thoughts on what it might be, but wanted to canvas opinion. As you can
> probably see from the photos it has no root development and is unworn.
> Biro lid for scale, the tooth is about 8mm in length.
> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/tzirvauf183ve3w/AACSX8mHrMhsCfz6CM3xu911a?dl=0
> [1]
>
> Many thanks in advance.
>
> Julia
> --
>
> DR JULIA E. M. CUSSANS
> Archaeozoologist
>
> [2] [3] [4]
> BURY ST EDMUNDS:  6 Brunel Business Court, Eastern Way, Bury St
> Edmunds, Suffolk, IP32 7AJ.  01284 765 210
> SHEFFORD:  PI House, r/o 23 Clifton Road, Shefford, Bedfordshire,
> SG17 5AF.  01462 850 483
> WARE:  Sucklings Yard, Church Street, Ware, Hertfordshire, SG12
> 9EN.  Mon, Weds & Thurs: 01920 469 090
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message and any attachments
> is confidential information intended only for the use of individuals
> or entities named above. If the reader of this message is not the
> intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
> immediately by e-mail at the originating address.
>
> [5]
> Virus-free. www.avast.com [6]
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/tzirvauf183ve3w/AACSX8mHrMhsCfz6CM3xu911a?dl=0
> [2] http://wwwfacebook.com/ArchaeologicalSolutions
> [3] http://twitter.com/ArchaeologicalS
> [4] http://www.archaeologicalsolutions.co.uk
> [5]
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=link&amp;utm_campaign=sig-email&amp;utm_content=emailclient
> [6]
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=link&amp;utm_campaign=sig-email&amp;utm_content=emailclient
>
>