 |
 |
> > On 24 October 2016 at 16:28 David Lace <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > But now that Mark Weiss has offered an answer that is both logical, > historically aware and which makes comprehensive sense, any further discussion > will only be a waste of time. > I do so love it when someone decides that they are the List Manager, and the time has come to Close the Discussion. "That's it, children. The final word has been said. Nothing more to see, move along now." > > Unless Jamie wants to continue to nit picking with me, I will exit this > discussion. > Words fail me ... Actually, they don't, but I'll leave them unsaid, silent music. R. > > > --------------------Original Message-------------- > > Robert Hampson wrote: > > > If the song is written to be performed with music is it aesthetically > different from a 'song' which was always meant to be a poem - and for which > there never was a musical accompaniment? > > > Robert >