Print

Print


At 09:22 08/09/2016 +0100, John Bibby wrote:
>You wrote: "...the government, being the monopoly issuer of the currency, 
>has no financial constraints on its spending .... ". But what ARE the 
>constraints then?  I'd like to see this unpicked. In particular, the 
>constraints due to fear of inflation.

As someone with no education in economics, I've often pondered that very 
basic question.  I may be totally wrong, but it seems to me that it only 
becomes relevant in terms of international trade (both directions) and is, 
indeed, all about inflation (although that probably does not matter, per 
se, in the absence of international considerations).

As I see it (quite probably wrongly!), within an 'isolated' country, 
currency is simply a convenient tokenisation of 'bartyring'.  A country has 
finite resources, in terms of both physical resources and, more 
importantly, the available labour force.  It doesn't really matter whether 
people are paid £10 per hour and have to pay £2.50 for a loaf of bread or 
whether they are paid £1000 per hour and have to pay £250 for the loaf - in 
either case the loaf costs them 15 minutes' income.  Although we would call 
the latter 'inflation', I don't see that it matters (directly) within an 
'isolated' country - but could well become an issue when one has to 
interact with the rest of the world.  To me, the important issue is that, 
even within an isolated country, merely printing more currency does not, in 
itself, do anything the increase the resources - so, in the final analysis, 
if the resources are already being used optimally and appropriately, there 
ought to be nothing more that they could spend on anything, even if they 
printed a lot more currency.

It may, of course, be possible to increase the effectiveness/efficiency of 
the resources (e.g. by education/training of the workforce), but I can't 
see that as being directly related to the currency supply.

Things obviously happen transiently immediately after an increase in 
available currency, but I would think that a 'steady state' is probably 
usually achieved fairly quickly.

Am I being naive and getting it all totally wrong?

Kind Regards,


John

----------------------------------------------------------------
Dr John Whittington,       Voice:    +44 (0) 1296 730225
Mediscience Services       Fax:      +44 (0) 1296 738893
Twyford Manor, Twyford,    E-mail:   [log in to unmask]
Buckingham  MK18 4EL, UK
----------------------------------------------------------------

******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk.
*******************************************************