Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines: How evidence-based are they? http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/01443615.2014.920794
Eminence-based guidelines: a
quality assessment of the second Joint British Societies’
guidelines on the prevention of cardiovascular
disease,
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01310.x/full
Diabetes.
No significant impact of tight glycemic control on
the risk of dialysis/transplantation/renal death, blindness, or
neuropathy. But 95% of guidelines unequivocally endorsed
benefit.
http://circoutcomes.ahajournals.org/content/early/2016/08/23/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002901.full.pdf?ijkey=hnQfo3zmmZFECR8&keytype=ref
Reporting of financial conflicts
of interest in clinical practice guidelines: a case study
analysis of guidelines from the Canadian Medical Association
Infobase
http://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-016-1646-5
Financial
Relationships With Industry Among National Comprehensive Cancer
Network Guideline
Authors
http://oncology.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2546172
-un saludo juan gérvas @JuanGrvas
Interesting article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3725 (via @Mendeley_com)@LuizaDear Luisa,GreetingsDid you read this paperEBM a movement in crisis? BMJ 2014It discusses the same argument you have kindly raised here!Regards,Yasser AmerKing Saud University