 |
 |
The corrected version has a note in the help text mentioning that the issue has been corrected. If you grep the usage text for Eklund, it should show up something like this: $ 3dClustSim | grep Eklund ** It was pointed out to me (by Anders Eklund and Tom Nichols) that smoothing $ Whereas the old version: $ 3dClustSim | grep Eklund $ If I had to guess, I would suspect that your version may not be new, based on the 2011_12_12_1014 string there. I have a version like that here: $ afni -version Precompiled binary =Debian-x86_64-1-gnu: Mar 6 2016 (Version AFNI_2011_12_21_1014) $ That is definitely not the corrected version. -Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: SPM (Statistical Parametric Mapping) [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > On Behalf Of Yang Hu > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 5:43 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: [SPM] How to make sure that I used the corrected version of > 3dClustSim > > Dear Experts, > After I read the Cluster Failure paper and John's blog, I checked my > previous analyses with 3dClustSim. For example, my command is like this: > > 3dClustSim -mask mask.hdr -fwhmxyz 11.9 11.9 10.9 -niter 10000 -prefix > SPMmask -NN 2 -nodec -2side > > When running the command, it showes sth like a version information in the > terminal: > "++3dClustSim: AFNI version=FNI_2011_12_21_1014 (Mar 6 2016) [64 bit] > ..." > > I just want to make sure that this is not the corrected version of > 3dClustSim, right? If so, what should the command in the updated > 3dClustSim be like? > > Thanks for your help! > > Best, > Yang ********************************************************** Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues