 |
 |
Ah, so I misspoke a little, perhaps: we've discussed it in the Storage Group (meeting), but the draft document is currently visible to the "official" Storage Group people (Jens, Me, Marcus, Brian), just because it seemed faster to try to get something from the 4 of us, before we opened it out for others to further adjust. Sam On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:43 AM David Colling <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi Sam, > > I have missed this - did you send it to the storage list or to > individuals? I am on the storage list but didn't see it so perhaps I > have filtered it. Please can you send a link to it to the tb-support list. > > Thanks, > david > > On 24/06/16 10:32, Sam Skipsey wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > There's a draft storage document in circulation in the Storage Group. > > It's quite big, so I think I want to pare it down and refocus it (we've > > had a few different viewpoints on how to focus it)... > > > > Sam > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:02 AM David Colling <[log in to unmask] > > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > > > > I have just heard from Andrew that he will not be able to connect > today. > > Do we actually need a technical meeting today? The major item I have > > that is outstanding is the storage document from Sam and Steve, so > what > > is the progress on this? > > > > Best, > > david > > > > On 24/06/16 08:59, David Colling wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > > > We are due a technical meeting today and I have cloned the last > > agenda to: > > > > > > https://indico.cern.ch/event/546682/ > > > > > > I will probably have to leave this meeting early but hopefully > Andrew > > > can chair after I leave. > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > david > > > > > >