Glad I didn’t get it; but it seems just proper that you did,Pat.
Doug
> On Jun 22, 2016, at 2:34 AM, Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> It's the 'may have' that intrigues isn't it, Pat. May not have too,
> presumably. So the attachment may yet be living on. Who can tell?
>
> Bill
>
> On Wednesday, 22 June 2016, Patrick McManus <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> ATTACHMENT
>> (found sad love poem)
>>
>> attachment unavailable
>> this attachment
>> may have been removed
>> or the person
>> who shared it
>> may not have permission to share it with you
>>
>>
>> pmcmanus
>> r987
>>
>> some of you sadly may had this delivered -be brave be strong be etc
>> Patrick older and grumpier
>>
Douglas Barbour
[log in to unmask]
https://eclecticruckus.wordpress.com/
Recent publications: (With Sheila E Murphy) Continuations & Continuations 2 (UofAPress).
Recording Dates (Rubicon Press).
Automobile Accident
Not finding where the flowers were
he seized a tree.
Lorine Niedecker
