Yes, I believe so!
Anaya
From: The archaeobotany mailing list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of BASTIAENS, JAN
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 11:06 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: ID help Medieval Oslo
C looks like Prunus padus.
Is D a small Punica granatum?
Vriendelijke groeten,
Jan
Jan Bastiaens | Erfgoedonderzoeker Onderzoek en Bescherming
T +32 2 553 18 32 | F +32 2 553 16 55
Onroerend Erfgoed | Koning Albert II-laan 19 bus 5 | 1210 Brussel
Van: The archaeobotany mailing list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Namens Helmut Kroll
Verzonden: dinsdag 14 juni 2016 19:09
Aan: [log in to unmask]
Onderwerp: Re: ID help Medieval Oslo
Dr. Helmut Kroll
Projensdorfer Str. 195
24106 Kiel
Tel 0431 334433
Am 14.06.2016 um 19:01 schrieb "Schepers, M." <[log in to unmask]>:
A=ruppia maritima
Op dinsdag 14 juni 2016 heeft Maria Sture <[log in to unmask]> het volgende geschreven:Dear colleagues,
I am currently working on macro botanic remains from a Medieval latrine context. Any help on ID would be appreciated!
A: The peculiar bent shape should make it possible to id, but I haven’t been able to.
B: These look most like Carex pilulifera, but I’m not convinced.
C: Stone from drupe. Too small to be Prunus spinosa which is also present in the sample.
D: Peculiar seed. I have no idea.
E: Looks a bit like any flat seed with a bit texture, e.g. Allium or Veronica
Single picture: Could it be the outer (green) coating of Juglans regia …?
Best regards,
Maria Sture
NIKU
--
M. (Mans) Schepers, PhD
Groningen Institute of Archaeology
Botany Group / Terp Research Group
Poststraat 6
9712 ER Groningen
telephone: (+31 50) 363 6712