 |
 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Jacob, in the mtz-file, you would list F, its hkl, and DANO. This should avoid the ambiguity you point at. Best, Tim On Monday, May 09, 2016 06:28:02 PM Keller, Jacob wrote: > Dear Crystallographers, > > I am curious about the sign convention of Dano as follows: > > The definition of Dano of hkl is F(hkl) - F(-h-k-l), so for example > > Dano(2,3,5) = F(2,3,5) - F(-2,-3,-5) > > What about mixed-sign indices, for example > > Dano(2,3,-5) = F(2,3,-5) - F(-2,-3,5) > > OR > > Dano(2,3,-5) = F(-2,-3,5) - F(2,3,-5) > > What is the convention? I think this might possibly have ramifications for > detwinning. > > JPK > > > ******************************************* > Jacob Pearson Keller, PhD > Looger Lab/HHMI Janelia Research Campus > 19700 Helix Dr, Ashburn, VA 20147 > email: [log in to unmask] > ******************************************* - -- - -- Paul Scherrer Institut Tim Gruene - - persoenlich - OFLC/102 CH-5232 Villigen PSI phone: +41 (0)56 310 5297 GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iD8DBQFXMPxyUxlJ7aRr7hoRAmufAJ96qEyjwIRTtR/5tE2VfPwTiSJN8QCgoYCh ncAjakeV6QwEJeemPGG9iGg= =I87n -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----