Print

Print


As luck would have it, I have put together a "challenge" data set series 
here:
http://smb.slac.stanford.edu/~holton/challenge/twin/

Currently, the top contender is SHELXD, which can find all 12 sites 
using data with a twin fraction of 0.44.  Phasing, however, still fails 
at this twin fraction.  Nobody has been able to solve this structure 
using data with alpha=0.30 or higher.  But, if you "cheat" and know the 
right answer, then all 12 sites are clearly resolved up to a 50:50 
twin.  So, theoretically, there is no reason why you couldn't write a 
program to do this, but to the best of my knowledge nobody has.

Any takers?

-James Holton
MAD Scientist

On 4/3/2016 2:05 AM, Eleanor Dodson wrote:
> hmmm - in the ideal world with perfect data and a twin factor < 0.5 
> you would detwin your data before trying sad or mad..
>
> But detaining inevitably increases the Sigmas so a weak signal can be 
> lost..
> The lab philosophy was - if you need to do expel phasing, and the data 
> are twinned look for another crystal … But that may be too negative.
>
> You could try it and see if the phasing improved.
>
> Eleanor
>
> On 1 April 2016 at 21:40, Keller, Jacob <[log in to unmask] 
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
>     Dear Crystallographers,
>
>     It occurred to me that SAD/MAD would work much better by
>     incorporating twinning into the HA finding/refining/phasing stage,
>     since the Bijvoet differences could be split according to the
>     twinning fraction and/or the HA's would be transformed by the twin
>     operator and weighted by alpha and (1-alpha). I believe twinning
>     is not currently modeled during this stage, even though for
>     twinned structures this would dramatically improve things almost
>     to the level of untwinned data, I think. Twin fractions could be
>     determined at the HA stage, then everything would go more
>     smoothly. Any thoughts of such an implementation? Perhaps Shelx
>     does this since 1969 or something?
>
>     I thought of this because I saw some really deep "holes" in the
>     Phaser output from a twinned dataset, and think these might be the
>     evil other twin sneaking in?
>
>     JPK
>
>
>     *******************************************
>     Jacob Pearson Keller, PhD
>     Looger Lab/HHMI Janelia Research Campus
>     19700 Helix Dr, Ashburn, VA 20147
>     email: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>     *******************************************
>
>