Hi Steve
Thanks for posting. An interesting question. Some immediate thoughts:
My reading of this is that ‘being housed leads to an increase in mental well-being’ is a proposition that posits a relationship between
two variables (housing status and mental health status). What is missing is the ‘how and why’ does being housed lead to an increase in mental well being – ie what’s missing is the mechanism.
So, what is it about being housed that improves people’s mental well being? I know this seems obvious – ‘of course people feel better
when they are housed’… but why is that? Through what mechanism(s) does being housed lead to an improvement in someone’s mental well-being? Similarly, what is it about being housed that enables people to choose healthier lifestyles? You can see housing as
a resource, mental health/healthier lifestyle is an outcome – what’s the mechanism through which housing influences mental health/health lifestyles?
Hope this helps a little. Am sure the more philosophically inclined will have something to say. And am sure people will have a different
take on this too.
Best wishes
Joanne
From: Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Rolfe
Sent: 02 March 2016 14:20
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Boundaries of generative causation
Hi
I'm in the early stages of a research project, looking at the potential health impacts of social enterprise in the housing/homelessness field. I'm planning to take a Realist approach to both the
evidence review and fieldwork aspects of the project (combined with elements of Theories of Change, as I've done on a previous project).
I'm just developing some rough theories to act as starting points for a realist review of the interactions between housing/homelessness and health, and some of the ideas I've come up with don't seem
to fit with the notion of generative causation. So, for example, one rough theory might be that becoming housed enables people to choose healthier lifestyle options, which seems like a clear case of generative causation. However, it also seems intuitively
obvious that becoming housed will lead to an increase in mental wellbeing, which to my mind doesn't seem to fit easily with generative causation - the increase in mental wellbeing doesn't seem to rely on the capacities or decisions of the individual, rather
the fact of being housed might make them feel better.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Am I thinking about it in the wrong way, or are there outcomes in situations like this which don't necessarily rely on generative causation?
Many thanks
Steve
Steve Rolfe
Commonhealth Research Fellow
School of Social Sciences
University of Stirling
01786-467749
The University achieved an overall 5 stars in the QS World University Rankings 2015
The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC 011159.