 |
 |
I used a hybrid (inductive and deductive) thematic analysis process in my PhD work. It allowed me to first, test my MRT and then to build my MRT. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Shep Chid <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Dear Marie-Hélèn > > Thank you for your kind suggestion and I am now on the right track. > > Have a happy Easter > > Sincerely > > Shep > > Sherphard Chidarikire (Shep) RN |MN (Nurse Practitioner) Lecturer/PhD > Candidate (Mental Health)| School of Health Sciences > University of Tasmania| Locked Bag 1322, Launceston TAS 7250 > Email: [log in to unmask] T: 6324 3752| F: 6324 3952 > > On 28 Jan 2016, at 7:46 PM, Marie-Hélène Paré <[log in to unmask] > <[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > > Dear Shep, > > > > Unless you want to generate a theory from the data – which involves an > awful lot of work and is frankly beyond the expected outcome of a realist > review – Boyatzis’ thematic analysis is ideal to uncover themes and > identify relationship between them. > > > > Here > <http://ecpr.eu/Filestore/CustomContent/MethodsSchool/WinterSchool/2016/Adv%20QDA%20Course%20Outline.pdf> > is a course I teach on it at the upcoming Winter School of the European > Consortium for Political Research in Germany next Feb – see page 3, day 2. > > > > Good luck! > > > > Marie-Hélène > > > > > > > > > > <image001.png> > > > > Training & Consultancy in NVivo Software > > Seminars & Courses in Qualitative Data Analysis > > Research & Evaluation in International Social Work > > > > > > C/ Dos de Maig, 200, SA 2ª | 08013 | Barcelona, Spain > > Office: + 34 932 464 690 | Cell: +34 693 707 150 > > [log in to unmask] > > > > <image002.png> <https://uoc.academia.edu/MarieH%C3%A9l%C3%A8nePar%C3%A9> > <image003.png> > <https://www.qsrinternational.com/training-and-events_training-and-consultancy_directory_detail.aspx?view=89> > <image004.png> <https://twitter.com/TheQualAnalyst> > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > *Upcoming Courses on Qualitative Data Analysis* > > > > 5th ECPR Winter School, Bamberg, Germany, February 2016 > > WA111 <http://ecpr.eu/Events/PanelDetails.aspx?PanelID=4517&EventID=103> - > Introduction to NVivo for Qualitative Data Analysis > > WD205 <http://ecpr.eu/Events/PanelDetails.aspx?PanelID=4535&EventID=103> – Advanced > Qualitative Data Analysis > > > > *From:* Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards > [mailto:[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>] *On Behalf Of *Shep > Chid > *Sent:* Thursday, January 28, 2016 8:07 > *To:* [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> > *Subject:* Approaches to analysing data for a realist review > > > > Dear All > > > > I'm in the middle of my realist review on the experiences of people with > schizophrenia in subSaharan Africa. > > > > I was wondering if there are specific approaches to analysing the data in > a realist review. For instance can I use thematic analysis or grounded > theory as a strategy to make sense of the data and generate theme. > > > > Thank you in advance. > > > Sincerely > > > > Shep > > > > Sherphard Chidarikire (Shep) RN |MN (Nurse Practitioner) Lecturer/PhD > Candidate (Mental Health)| School of Health Sciences > > University of Tasmania| Locked Bag 1322, Launceston TAS 7250 > > Email: [log in to unmask] T: 6324 3752| F: 6324 3952 > >