Fascinating! Especially the fact that book publishers are assigned a level (making the assumption that everything they publish is at that level) and the multiplier
for externally co-authored papers. Thanks for this detailed response.
Elizabeth Gadd MSc, MCLIP, FHEA
Research Policy Manager (Publications)
Research Office
Loughborough University
Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU
T: 01509 228594
S: lizziegadd
Working Hours:
Mon 8.30-5
Tues 8.30-3
Wed 8.30-3
Google Scholar Citation Profile
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4509-7785
http://about.me/elizabeth.gadd
From: A bibliometrics discussion list for the Library and Research
Community [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Marianne Gauffriau
Sent: 21 March 2016 12:28
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: SV: Can we implement the Leiden Manifesto principles in our daily work with research indicators? - Input from Danish practitioners working with research indicators
Thanks for the interest. BFI or the bibliometric research indicator is a Danish system used to assign points to publications, and based on the points, to distribute a part of the public, basic funding to universities.
Publications are registered in Pure databases at the universities and once a year harvested by the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation. Similar systems exist in Norway and Finland.
BFI divides journals in two groups, level 1 and 2 where level 2 is the most prestigious. Whether a journal belongs to level 2 or 1 is determined by experts from the relevant research fields. There are 68 expert groups.
The journals at level 2 account for 20 % of all publications in all journals annotated with a BFI level. If a journal is removed from level 2, it must be replaced by one or more journals with the same number of publications globally. From 2013 book publishers
are also assigned to a BFI level.
Here you can see the points assigned to publication types, e.g. a monograph gets 5 or 8 points. I’m sorry, but all information is in Danish:
http://ufm.dk/forskning-og-innovation/statistik-og-analyser/den-bibliometriske-forskningsindikator/vaegtning
Points are fractionalized. If three researchers co-author a paper they each get a third of the points. The lowest share is 1/10. Papers co-authored with researcher from other institutions, e.g. another Danish university,
get a bonus. The points are multiplied by 1.25.
All publication must be peer reviewed and published in a “BFI” journal:
http://ufm.dk/forskning-og-innovation/statistik-og-analyser/den-bibliometriske-forskningsindikator/autoritetslister/autoritetslisten-for-serier-2016-2017-xlsx.pdf
… or at a “BFI” book publisher:
http://ufm.dk/forskning-og-innovation/statistik-og-analyser/den-bibliometriske-forskningsindikator/autoritetslister/autoritetslisten-for-forlag-2016-2017-til-hjemmeside.pdf
Best wishes
Marianne
Fra: A bibliometrics discussion list for the Library and Research Community
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
På vegne af Elizabeth Gadd
Sendt: 21. marts 2016 12:12
Til: [log in to unmask]
Emne: Re: Can we implement the Leiden Manifesto principles in our daily work with research indicators? - Input from Danish practitioners working with research indicators
Thanks for sharing this Marianne – very interesting. I’d not come across the Danish Research Indicator (BFI) system before. Are you able to provide us with
a bit more information on this? Is the system community-generated or proprietary?
Elizabeth Gadd MSc, MCLIP, FHEA
Research Policy Manager (Publications)
Research Office
Loughborough University
Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU
T: 01509 228594
S: lizziegadd
Working Hours:
Mon 8.30-5
Tues 8.30-3
Wed 8.30-3
Google Scholar Citation Profile
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4509-7785
http://about.me/elizabeth.gadd
From: A bibliometrics discussion list for the Library and Research
Community [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Marianne Gauffriau
Sent: 17 March 2016 07:39
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Can we implement the Leiden Manifesto principles in our daily work with research indicators? - Input from Danish practitioners working with research indicators
Dear all
In January the Danish Research Indicator Network (FIN) arranged a discussion of the Leiden Manifesto (LM) among practitioners working with
research indicators. At the LM blog you find a report summarizing the discussions of each of the ten principles:
http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/blog
We hope the report can contribute to the work with the LM. We also recommend research indicator networks in other countries to arrange
similar discussions among practitioners as such discussions can give the participants valuable inspiration for their own work. At the FIN meeting, LM formed an excellent framework for our discussions.
Best wishes
Marianne
|
Det Kongelige Bibliotek |
Marianne Gauffriau |