Hi Mike

If you are happy to use it knowing that we haven’t yet fully tested all functionality, we could send a binary.

Best
Stam
 


On 21 Mar 2016, at 17:31, Michael Dwyer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi, just wanted to also chime on on this, as we're about to be running a lot of probtrackx analyses. Alternately, is there any possibility to get a beta version?

Best,
Mike

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:10 PM, David Gutman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Is there a ballpark on when the next FSL version will be released?  


On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:36 PM Stamatios Sotiropoulos <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hi Diederick

It really depends on your budget, to our experience the best value for money (from the top solutions) is the Tesla K80. This actually includes two GPUs in one card, it has a lot of memory and we find it works very well for high-mem applications as well.

We will release a GPU version of probtrackX in the next FSL versions and our experience of that with K80 has been great.

Cheers
Stam



> On 15 Mar 2016, at 14:26, Diederick Stoffers <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Could anyone comment on the best NVIDIA GPU to choose for running bedpostx; one optimised for single or double precision floating point (I would expect the latter)? Any recommendation to a specific model (taking value for money into account)?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Diederick



--
Michael G. Dwyer, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Neurology and Biomedical Informatics
Director of Technical Imaging Development
Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center
University at Buffalo
100 High St. Buffalo NY 14203
[log in to unmask]
(716) 859-7065