Hi Cath
I’m afraid I’d have reported him to the awarding body in respect of the disruption for the first exam (and have had to do so recently for several students).
Unless there is a medical condition that has prompted the behaviour I would stop the exam and refuse to allow him/her to continue. I’d also not allow them to have the separate room if the only grounds was disruptive
behaviour – they either behave or they don’t sit. Or if they sit and misbehave they get reported.
Regards
Lorna
From: The FE
Exams Network mailing list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Cath Smith
Sent: 17 March 2016 11:40
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Disruptive students
Hi
Just wondering how you deal with a student who has been put in separate room to take his exam due to his potential disruptive behaviour. His behaviour during the exam was very bad, swearing, refusing to do any work etc.
He was granted an exam concession of a prompter, my question is how much should the invigilator and prompter put up with, should the prompter have spent time trying to persuade him to behave and get on with his work or should they just
have stopped the exam due to his behaviour.
What are your thoughts on this kind of situation?
We are a main stream FE college not a pupil referral unit.
Cath Smith
Examinations Officer
MIS/Exams
Tel: 01780 484300 Ext: 368
Fax: 01780 484301
Email:
[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Drift Road, Stamford, Lincolnshire, PE9 1XA
P Please think before you click 'reply all'
P Please consider the environment - do you really
need to print this email?
This message is sent in confidence for the addressee only. It may contain confidential or sensitive information. The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorised recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality
and to advise us of any errors in transmission. Thank you. Please note that the College reserves the right to monitor emails for the business purposes contained in the Telecommunications (Lawful Business Practice)(Interception of Communications) Regulations
2000, that is: to establish the existence of facts relevant to the business of the College, to investigate or detect unauthorised use of the systems; to maintain the effective operation of the system; to detect any computer viruses; to check the mailbox of
any absent employee; or to prevent or detect a crime. To be able to exercise these rights, the College must have made all reasonable attempts to inform every person who may use the system that monitoring and interception may take place. This College regards
this notice to you as notification of such a possibility.