Dear All,
Thanks again for your responses. I
enjoy reading your thoughts on these matters, but again they diverge
off into so many threads that it's difficult to keep track of
discussions on a group email. There must be a Google+ group or something
similar which would help us all keep track of who says what without
scrolling back through our inboxes.
@JohnBald - It
must have been great to count Michel Thomas as a friend, I to find him a
very inspirational character and I have quite a few of his quotes
printed out on my classroom walls. I accept that I mis-characterised his
approach saying with regards to oracy, as in all his original four
courses he does deal with spelling systems and differences early on. I
was conflating it with the Harold Browne course, in which he gets very
explicit about it not dealing with reading and writing.
I read the Learning Revolution with interest, a former HoD passed me his copy - his school was using the
Es Posible / C'est Possible courses to great effect.
@Tim Nash I'm
not sure how one might adapt the MT method to teach Chinese to high
school students and incorporate Hanzi and PinYin, but I'd be very
interested to see what such an approach looked like. My guess is that it
would be supplemented by a gradually increasing usage of Skritter to
develop character recognition and writing. What I do like about the MT
approach, with European languages, is that it is very specific about the
content taught and the order, so that students understand the most
useful structures and languages first.
Minute Mandarin
looks slick, I'll take a good look at it this CNY break and get back to
you. My initial thought is that it looks like another great tool for
individual learner (forgot to mention the Amanda reading app in
my list of great tools for learners) - do you see it as a tool that
could be used to teach classes of students and if so, how would that
work? Or, is it that you think that as teachers we need to move to a more de-centralised model of instruction?
Regarding AIM, what I found when I
attended a couple of their courses was that their approach systemetises a
lot of things which I had been using instinctively, but with less
rigour and forethought - it really helped me to crystalise my approach to
100% Target Language use in the classroom and gave me a better framework
for using gestures. It is also great fun for the students. With French
and Spanish, writing is introduced pretty quickly, but then this is less
of an issue with European languages.