Print

Print


Hi Kai,

The results I found look fine:
- With EBs:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2785709/outbox/mailinglist/kaiwang/eb_vox_tstat_uncp_c3.nii.gz
- Without EBs:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2785709/outbox/mailinglist/kaiwang/noeb_vox_tstat_uncp_c3.nii.gz

The config files for these two runs are attached.

I wonder why you have zstat files, and not ztstat or tstat. I'll run again
in the afternoon with the -zstat option and compare.

All the best,

Anderson


On 1 February 2016 at 05:32, Kai Wang <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Anderson,
>
> I update PALM, (originally it was alpha56, now it's alpha79) and run the
> design with 200 permutations. Unfortunately the problem remained. Yes
> everything looks good in the FWE results. But if you look at the
> "vox_zstat_uncp_c3", it is a binary map with the value of 0.995 in vast
> grey matter areas. Actually, this was the map I was talking about in the
> original question email. Sorry I didn't make it clear.
>
> Thank you
> Kai
>