With apologies for cross posting, a final CFP for a session at the RGS-IBG 2016.
CFP
– RGS-IBG Conference 2016
Historical
Geographies of Peace and Non-Violence
Convenors:
Ben Houston, Nick Megoran, Matthew Scott (all Newcastle University, UK)
Sponsored by the Historical Geography Research Group
2016
marks the bicentenary of the Society for the Promotion of Permanent and Universal Peace’s founding, an event widely seen by historians as the beginning of the modern British peace movement. Originally centred in London, the Peace Society soon had affiliated
auxiliaries dispersed widely across the country, such as in Edinburgh, Newcastle, and Southampton (Ceadel, 1996). The occasion of this bicentenary encourages a deeper consideration of the entwined histories and geographies of war and peace and, indirectly,
the prominence that the former has until recently held over the latter in geographical scholarship. This session will explore ways in which historical geographical approaches can enrich emerging literatures concerning the geographies of peace.
While
geographers have been adept at conceptualising and critiquing the spatiality of modern and late-modern war, “our understanding of what peace looks like, and how to research it, remains under-developed” (Williams and McConnell, 2011: 297). A number of researchers
have consequently begun to consider geographical approaches to peace and non-violence (e.g. McConnell, Megoran, and Williams, 2014; Megoran, 2011; Loyd, 2012; Springer, 2014; Williams, 2015). These approaches each recognise the need to rethink peace as more
than just the absence or cessation of war, but rather as a precarious socio-spatial process, something that is made and remade across different sites and scales (Koopman, forthcoming). Peace is now increasingly conceptualised as spatially and temporally contingent,
meaning different things to different people and groups at different times and places. This conceptualisation invites us to explore the potential contributions of historical geography to the burgeoning geographies of peace literatures. Historical geographers
have repeatedly examined and critiqued the intimate connections between geography and war (e.g. Heffernan, 1996; Godlewska and Smith, 1994), and the tools of historical geography similarly offer a great deal towards deepening our understanding of peace and
non-violence across different times and places.
Potential
topics could include, but are not restricted to,
Please
send abstracts of no more than 250 words to
[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], and
[log in to unmask] by no later than
Friday 12th February. Successful abstracts will be informed by no later than February 18th.
Location:
Royal Geographical Society in London; Dates: 30 August to 2 September 2016; Conference website:
http://www.rgs.org/WhatsOn/ConferencesAndSeminars/Annual+International+Conference/Annual+international+conference.htm
References
Ceadel,
M. (1996) The Origins of War Prevention: The British Peace Movement and International Relations, 1730-1854. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Godlewska,
A. and Smith, N; eds. (1994) Geography and Empire. Oxford: Blackwell.
Heffernan,
M. (1996) ‘Geography, Cartography and Military Intelligence: The Royal Geographical Society and the First World War’,
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 21 (3): pp.504-533.
Koopman,
S. (forthcoming) ‘Peace’, Entry in the forthcoming AAG Encyclopaedia of Geography.
Loyd,
J.M. (2012) ‘Geographies of Peace and Antiviolence’, Geography Compass 6 (8): pp.477-489.
McConnell,
F; Megoran, N; and Williams, P; eds. (2014) Geographies of Peace.
Megoran,
N. (2011) ‘War and Peace? An agenda for peace research and practice in geography’
Political Geography 30 (4): pp.178-189.
Springer,
S. (2014) ‘War and pieces’, Space and Polity 18 (1): 85-96.
Williams,
P. and McConnell, F. (2011) ‘Critical geographies of peace’, Antipode 43 (4): pp.927-931.
Williams,
P. (2015) Everyday Peace? Politics, citizenship and Muslim lives in India.