What about good old size exclusion?




From: CCP4 bulletin board <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Bonsor, Daniel <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, 15 February 2016 11:57 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] MBP fusion
 

Sorry I did not actually address the question. My bad &#X02639.


If you don't want to reinvent the wheel, you could potentially use a MonoQ or a MonoS column. Depending on the pI of your protein and the fusion you maybe able to separate them. MBP is quite acidic. If your protein is also acidic you may/may not be able to separate them on a MonoQ. If you protein is basic I would use the MonoS as MBP will have problems sticking at high pH. The fusion should stick to the MonoS through your protein. If neutral, you may have problems with ionic exchange.


If your protein of interest has an antibody or known binding partner you could make an affinity column using CNBr activated beads.


Dan




Daniel A. Bonsor PhD
Institute of Human Virology,
University of Maryland at Baltimore
725 W. Lombard Street N571
Baltimore
MD 21201



From: CCP4 bulletin board <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Bonsor, Daniel <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2016 8:47 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] MBP fusion
 

We have had success by moving the MBP (or MBP-fusion) to a C-terminal His vector (pET21 in our case, though others will probably work). We typically use the His-tag as purification and not the MBP. This will result in full length protein. Occasionally we will observe some degradation. If so we dilute the Ni-Elution fraction 2-fold with MBP binding buffer and then flow over Amylose beads. This will separate only full length protein.


If the MBP is C-terminal, use an N-terminal His-tagged vector.



All the best!


Dan


Daniel A. Bonsor PhD
Institute of Human Virology,
University of Maryland at Baltimore
725 W. Lombard Street N571
Baltimore
MD 21201



From: CCP4 bulletin board <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Fernandez, Elias J <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2016 6:17 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [ccp4bb] MBP fusion
 


Dear Colleagues,
We are attempting to express our target protein fused to MBP in BL21(DE3) and BL21(RIPL). Unfortunately, we get a mixture of MBP-target protein and MBP only, which severely depletes our overall yield of MBP-target protein. We've tried enriched media, such as 2xYT & TB and also optimal high-density induction in minimal media at temperatures ranging from 20-37deg and IPTG from 0.05-0.5microM.
Any suggestions to address this competitively high yield of MBP-only protein?
Cheers,
Elias