Print

Print


Thank you for your quick response Jürgen,

I am going to repeat the analysis in order to see if I missed something or make something wrong....

Nice to meet you.

Best wishes and happy new year :-)

Yours sincerely,

Rosalia.

2015-12-28 8:41 GMT+01:00 JuergenHaenggi <[log in to unmask]>:
Dear Rosalia

In my opinion, the AD values are OK and are not constant. The RD values are clearly wrong (they should be similar to AD values in magnitude).
The RD value you report (155323) might be the volume of the skeleton.

HTH
Cheers
Jürgen


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
University of Zurich
Dr. Jürgen Hänggi, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology
Division Neuropsychology
Binzmuehlestrasse 14, PO Box 25 
8050 Zurich, Switzerland

0041 44 635 73 97 (phone office)
0041 76 445 86 84 (phone mobile)       
0041 44 635 74 09 (fax office)
BIN 4.D.04 (office room number)                     

[log in to unmask] (email)
http://www.psychologie.uzh.ch/neuropsy/ (website)
http://www.juergenhaenggi.ch (private website)   

This e-mail (and any attachment/s) contains confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this
e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Am 28.12.2015 um 08:01 schrieb Rosalia Dacosta Aguayo:

Dear FSL experts,

I have been doing calculations in order to get the average of FA, AD, and RD values for all my subjects in order to adjust for those variables as possible confounders in my results (part of my sample has lesions that may affect WM structure). Well, whereas FA shows some variability, AD and RD values remain constants....(see the three columns...). I have two questions regarding this.

1. The first one is it is normal to get similar AD values for all the subjects as well as similar RD values.

2. Does it make any sesnse to try to covariate for AD and RD values taking into account they remain constant?? I ask this question because I am interested in studying FA, RD and AD maps....

Thank you for all your help.

Rosalia.

FA_VALUES AD_VALUES RD_VALUES
0.394522 0.001156 155323
0.408431 0.001103 155323
0.407739 0.001121 155323
0.362224 0.001173 155323
0.405417 0.001079 155323
0.401938 0.001157 155323
0.407141 0.001145 155323
0.341876 0.001218 155323
0.36687 0.00116 155323
0.378267 0.001149 155323
0.383875 0.00116 155323
0.368302 0.001179 155323
0.402161 0.00114 155323
0.335709 0.001207 155323
0.37291 0.001164 155323
0.391186 0.001186 155323
0.335775 0.001249 155323
0.317808 0.00119 155323
0.389519 0.001155 155323
0.246906 0.001528 155323
0.376403 0.001117 155323
0.373154 0.001167 155323
0.345241 0.001159 155323
0.384342 0.001178 155323