Print

Print
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. So you are saying that topup expects "1 0 0" vector for R >> L sequences independent of the image orientation (LAS, RAS, ALS...)?

Is this the same with the --unwarpdir in fugue?

Best,
Chris

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Harms, Michael <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi,
I believe it depends on the orientation of your NIFTI file.  If you have an LAS oriented volume, then there is no inconsistency relative to TOPUP/Faq examples -- i.e., P>>A and R>>L are both in the direction of increasing index.

cheers,
-MH

-- 
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO  63110 Email: [log in to unmask]

From: Chris Filo Gorgolewski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, December 2, 2015 6:53 PM
To: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [FSL] Describing phase encoding direction in topup

Dear all,
I was trying to translate a the phase encoding vectors used in TOPUP from the usual LR/RL, AP/PA to something more scanning object agnostic (afterall I can run topup n a scan of a watermelon that does not have left/right, anterior/posterior sides). From what I see in http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/TOPUP/Faq there is some inconsistency.

For the second axis (y) if the phase encoding direction goes from zero to maximum index the vector in --datain should be set to 0 1 0 (equivalent to P >> A). If if the direction goes from maximum index to zero it should be set to 0 -1 0. (equivalent to A >> P) This makes sense.

However for the first axis (x) the situation is opposite. if the phase encoding direction goes from zero to maximum index the vector in --datain should be set to -1 0 0 (equivalent to L >> R). If if the direction goes from maximum index to zero it should be set to 1 0 0 (equivalent to R >> L).

Am I correct in my deductions? Is there a reason for this inconsistency?

Best,
Chris Gorgolewski

 

The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.