hi

I agree with Brian and want to add that it is important that you model as much of the variance as you can, and if you model A and B together you might have less flexibility to model the variance and therefore the goodness of fit of the model in some voxels might be significantly affected (i.e. reduced). So even if you are interested in C, the voxels that show some effect to C might also be activated or deactivated to A or B. If they are not activated or deactivated to A and B precisely the same then your explained variance will be reduced (i.e. your residuals == error will be greater) and therefore you might miss the effect of C that you are looking for (since such voxels might not come out as significant; significance is affected by the error term).

Good luck
Sharon

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 6:26 PM, briannh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hi Claire,

the GLM must contain what different conditions etc you have that may influence data - so A and B should be modelled explicitly, not pooled. This is independent of what hypothesis (contrast) you're testing.
Best, Brian




On 2015-11-22 01:17, Claire Han wrote:
Dear experts,

I have a question about the design matrix.

I have conditions A, B, and C in a fMRI study. The only condition I am
interested in is C... Putting in my GLM, conditions A and B separately
(3 columns in total) vs. together (2 columns in total) - does this
affect my results, even bit?

Thanks!
Claire 



--
Sharon Gilaie-Dotan, PhD

UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience 
Alexandra House
17 Queen Square
London WC1N 3AR
Tel: +44-20-76791122
Mob: +972-54-4736181