Print

Print


See below.

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:39 AM, André Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hi Donald,
>
> 1) No my covariates match the number of scans for each group (G1:13 and
> G2:23). I just added two covariates. But maybe I have to use the multiple
> covariates option?
>

>> Where in the GUI did you enter the covariates?


>
> 2) Is there a way to compare the correlations?
>

Yes. See http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/docs30/CompareCorrCoeff.pdf

>
> Thank you
> André
> ------------------------------
> *Von:* MCLAREN, Donald [[log in to unmask]]
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 21. Oktober 2015 16:35
> *An:* André Schmidt
> *Cc:* SPM
> *Betreff:* Re: [SPM] comparing correlations across groups
>
> Andre,
>
> (1) Your covariate length is different than the number of scans. How did
> you enter the covariate?
> (2) Your analysis is comparing the slopes between groups, not the
> correlation.
>
> Best Regards,
> Donald McLaren, PhD
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:18 AM, André Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear experts,
>>
>> I want to test whether the correlation between brain activity and a
>> behavioral score is different between two groups. I tried to do this with a
>> 2-sample t test and adding the two behavioral scores as covariates for each
>> group separately and then using a contrast 1 -1 over the covariates.
>> However, I got the this error message:
>>
>> Running job #2
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Running 'Factorial design specification'
>> Failed  'Factorial design specification'
>> Error using spm_meanby (line 31)
>> row dimension mismatch between inputs
>> In file "/Users/andre/Documents/MATLAB/spm12/spm_meanby.m" (v1143),
>> function "spm_meanby" at line 31.
>> In file
>> "/Users/andre/Documents/MATLAB/spm12/config/spm_run_factorial_design.m"
>> (v6219), function "spm_run_factorial_design" at line 623.
>>
>> The following modules did not run:
>> Failed: Factorial design specification
>>
>> Can anybody guide how the specify the batch for this.
>>
>> Thank you very much
>> André
>>
>
>