>Should I take the effort to hand correct these issues

This should probably be just fine.

>the bunp posterior to the parital/occipital suture boundary Is muchi
>morepronounced in men then women

Do you technically mean bathrocrania?

Cheers.


Am 14.10.15 16:36 schrieb "FSL - FMRIB's Software Library on behalf of
Jennifer Vendemia" unter <[log in to unmask] on behalf of
[log in to unmask]>:

>I hiave some questions that I i've been thinking about on a technical
>level for some time, but have never considered in the abstract.  I'm
>using the fsl_anat sequence these days which is significantly improving
>the quality of my brain extractions.....but
>
>Even with the sequence the final extracted brain is missing the very top
>of the brain in some areas and including small bits of meninges in
>others.  I'm working in s1 s2 so I'm particularly interested in the gray
>matter at the vertex of the brain.
>
>The brain mask however is expanded slightly covering the brain AND some
>meninge.
>
>1.  What sort of consequences will this have on subsequent registrations
>such as for my .functional data?  Should I take the effort to hand
>correct these issues, or does fnirt blur the image enough to render these
>small differences unimportant?
>
>
>2.  Although well within the norms of human cariable, some of my
>participants have heads that are quite different than the standard.  The
>head to head registration pulls their heads into unexpected shapes (the
>bunp posterior to the parital/occipital suture boundary Is muchi
>morepronounced in men then women).  Some of my female oarticipants are
>getting n effect where the middle of their head is dragged upward.
>Should I refrain from the fnirt head registration step when this happens?