Dear Anderson,
Thank you for your detailed answer.
Please see below my questions.
Best regards,
Matthieu
Le 08/10/2015 09:48, Anderson M. Winkler a écrit :
I really want to do separate longitudinal analysis on each subject independantly. Is this way you explained above allowing some kind of statistical analysis on one subject with several timepoints ?Hi Matthieu,
There are multiple ways to analyse repeated measurements data, but if some timepoints are missing, it can be difficult. You mention "for each single subject", so this means dropping a group analysis. Even that is difficult: permutations within subject with many timepoints aren't allowed (same reason we don't do for first level fMRI). Parametric tests could be considered, but FA data shows skewness (you could address with a data transformation, like probit), but the random field theory won't work easily with TBSS data.
It is possible, however, to instead run fsl_glm and compute, for each subject, an image with the COPEs (in this case the same as the PEs, i.e., the "betas" of the GLM) for, e.g., a linear trend. With multiple subjects, say A, B, C, D, etc. you'll have COPE_A, COPE_B, COPE_C, etc. which can be tested in a 1-sample t-test. Some of these will have 4 timepoints, some 5, some 6, etc, which means they cannot simply be shuffled in randomise, as their variances aren't the same (more visits, lower variances around these estimates).
If this is the case, I don't see well how with fsl_glm to compute this COPE image for a subject ? Is this linear trend gives some information of increase/decrease of FA with increasing time for one subject ?
Do you mean that beyond the longitudinal single subject, I could make a group analysis with the few subjects (7 with 2 up to 4 timepoints) I have with PALM ?
However, you can define one variance group (VG) for each set of subjects that have the same number of timepoints (i.e., one VG for subjects with 4 visits, another for subjects with 5 visits, and so on), and use PALM with the options -vg and -ise (for independent and symmetric errors). This will compute a statistic that is robust to heteroscedasticity, in this case, the well known Aspin-Welch statistic.
If so, how to define each VG before launching PALM ?
This is just one possibility, but we have seen that ultimately the power is determined mostly by the size of the smallest VG.
All the best,
Anderson
On 7 October 2015 at 12:03, Matthieu Vanhoutte <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
MatthieuBest regards,I would like to longitudinally analyze the FA (MD, ADC,...) evolution for each single subject. Is there a method I could apply as TBSS is designed for longitudinal group analysis ?Dear FSl experts,I have a few subjects with different numbers of timepoints that are not equally time-spaced.