Were they
A) an effective team because they went for the curry together
B) a team that would go for a curry together because they were already an effective team
C) none of the above, or some other reason causing both, or just unrelated facts…?
Giles
From: Online forum for SEDA, the Staff & Educational Development Association [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cooper, Alison
Sent: 29 September 2015 14:43
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Staff Dining
As I recall, the report was about the effective team went out regularly and had curries together.
So I think it was small-scale, informal, non-institutional, and self-driven collaboration.
Which means we can all make such things happen, if we want to?
Ali
Sent from my iPhone
On 29 Sep 2015, at 11:40, Kieran Kelly <[log in to unmask]> wrote:Dear Colleagues,
Graham Gibbs is reputed to have once reported that the only difference he could find between two programme teams, one high-performing and one not so much, was that the high-performers ate together on a regular basis. My own institution no longer has any staff-only dining facilities, does yours and does it matter?
Regards
Kieran
Dr Kieran Kelly
Editor, Learning for All
UWE, Bristol
5E13
Frenchay Campus
0117 3281550
07768 723927