Print

Print


Dear Simon and colleagues,
I congratulate you for your fruitful translation of “canne à pêche” for “can of peaches”, similar to the Southwest Ontario anglo translation of the name of an island where the fish are plentiful: "Pêche Ile" has become “Peach Island” for many.
My own memorable translation from an early French class was “poste d’essence” as “perfume factory”.
Alan

W. Alan Wright, Ph.D.
Acting Dean of the Faculty of Education and Academic Development and
Vice-Provost, Teaching and Learning
University of Windsor
401 Sunset Avenue
Windsor, ON
Canada N9B 3P4
[log in to unmask]
519 253 3000 (3801)



From: "Online forum for SEDA, the Staff & Educational Development Association" on behalf of Simon Horsman
Reply-To: Simon Horsman
Date: Monday, September 14, 2015 at 12:36 PM
To: "[log in to unmask]"
Subject: Re: exam howlers

The critics are making an important point but, appropriately anonymised, the harm has to be negligible hasn’t it?  If it cannot be anonymised, then never publicise it.

 

And I still want credit for translating canne a peche as can of peaches in my O level French class c1962 – 53 years on, the truth can be told.

 

Simon Horsman

 

From: Online forum for SEDA, the Staff & Educational Development Association [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mark Gray
Sent: 14 September 2015 17:28
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: exam howlers

 

Amen, we are here to encourage not discourage.

 

On 14 Sep 2015, at 17:05, Cooper, Alison <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

 

I have so long objected to this, for school students and uni students – so it is great to have it contested on a wider stage.

 

There is no sense of humour involved in mocking people behind their backs, anonymous or otherwise. It is no different from laughing at people when they fall over a hidden obstacle put there for that express purpose. It cheapens and degrades those who do the mocking – so that’s OK!!

 

Ali

 

Ali Cooper | PFHEA, MA, MEd, PGCE |

Educational Development Adviser | Organisation & Educational Development  |

[log in to unmask]  | 01524 510632 | HR Building | Lancaster University | LA1 4YW 

 

<image001.jpg>

 

 

From: Online forum for SEDA, the Staff & Educational Development Association [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lea, John ([log in to unmask])
Sent: 14 September 2015 16:45
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: exam howlers

 

Thanks Helen. I'm glad this has come up and at the risk of sounding like someone without a sense of humour, I've always felt a little uneasy about this yearly tradition, because who wouldn't make mistakes when being asked to write very fast for 3 hrs while sitting in a sports hall in May? Yes, some of them are very funny, but perhaps the biggest joke is on the people who think that the person who wins the exam game is the most intelligent one in the class...

 

John

 

John Lea


Sent from my iPhone


On 14 Sep 2015, at 10:30, Helen Webster <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Dear colleagues, 

 

I just stumbled across an initiative on twitter regarding the annual practice of publishing exam howlers by students in the national press, in particular the Times Higher's competition inviting academics to submit their students' funniest mistakes. There's a letter being drafted to Universities UK, stating that not only does this 'shaming' of students conflict with the values of teaching, but may also breach universities' own policies around confidentiality and intellectual property in assessment. It seems to me that this is an issue on which educational developers might also have much to say, and thought I would pass it on via this list.

 

The letter is currently in draft, and comments are invited:

 

comments and signatures can be offered to Sjoerd Levelt via [log in to unmask], or @slevelt on twitter.

 

best wishes, 

 

Helen 

 

RANKED 15TH BEST UNIVERSITY IN THE UK

MODERN UNIVERSITY OF THE YEAR 2014 and 2015

Source: Guardian University Guide 2016 and The Sunday Times Good University Guide 2014/2015

NOTICE

This message and any files transmitted with it is intended for the addressee only and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. Unauthorised use is strictly prohibited. If you are not the addressee, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this message, except for the purpose of delivery to the addressee.

Any views or opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Coventry University.