Print

Print


*[apologies for cross-posting]*

Dear colleagues,

we are pleased to circulate the following Call for papers for the Special
Issue of the *Strategic Design Research Journal* (Aug/Sep 2016): "Exploring
Participatory Design as a strategy to act within the city"

Find below the full text of the call, the time schedule and the
information/links for the submission.

Best regards,

Chiara and Giacomo

------------------------------------------------

*Call for papers – Special Issue*

*Guest editors*: Chiara Del Gaudio and Giacomo Poderi

http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/sdrj/pages/view/call

*Exploring Participatory Design as a strategy to act within the city*

During the last decades, design has been changing: a system-oriented design
practice has emerged and opened design's field of action to several
different contexts which relate to human activities –both individual and
collective (Manzini, 2014).On one hand, the design object extended itself
from products to services and then to systems, made by tangible and
nontangible elements. On the other hand, design has started to concern not
only about the industry and commerce, but also about other areas such as
health, energy, education and transport systems, urban planning and
development, and well-being. In this sense, design is often considered to
act within the public sphere and in those areas that aim at improving one
or more aspects of people's life, particularly urban and suburban contexts
transformation.

Among the main reasons of this evolution are the widespread scepticisms,
fears and resistances against the predominant governance systems and the
institutions’ ability to deal with contemporary societal challenges that
call for greater and different efforts for greater and innovative efforts
for tackling them. Moreover, they prompt society for the need for a change
in the approaches and methodologies used for pursuing them. Simplistic,
monologic or unidirectional solutions seem no longer efficient and hardly
pursued. New configurations of actors, open solutions and a constant
dialogue are necessary to change and foster a more sustainable society in
an ecosystemic perspective. In this sense, a Strategic Design approach to
problem setting and solving (Manzini, 2014) combined with the tradition and
practices of Participatory Design (PD) appears as a fruitful path to
follow. Actually, the main pillar of the former is to enable a strategic
dialogue among different actors that can inspire and guide their diverse
perspectives towards the construction of a shared and plural vision. Its
core interest is the constant articulation of the ensemble of relationships
existing and developing in the ecosystems made of different organizations
such as consultancy, firms, institutions, governments, territories and
associations. At the same time, the activities and techniques of the latter
are able to regenerate “the local”, to rise interest around conflictual
topics, and to point out different ways to conceive and to solve them by
initiating and supporting human endeavours that are highly characterized by
collaborative, open and participatory processes.

Ecosystemic, participatory and strategic approaches acquire an astonishing
relevance in the public and urban sphere, where the paradigm of
open-innovation and collaborative ecosystems is becoming a consolidated
frame for attempting to tackle a very heterogeneous set of issues which can
range, for instance, from public transportation to environmental
challenges, from elderly care to education and integration of marginalized
groups. In fact, co-design practices and services that are implemented in
these collaborative ecosystems and that involve local population, enable
and foster a dialog among local forces and resources, and urban governance
mechanisms (Rizzo *et al.*, 2015). Urban Living Lab and Human Smart City
increasing initiatives are, for instance, an example of the promising
interplay among the three approaches that consider issues intertwined,
putting into action a great variety of actors at the centre of the process
and solutions.

In this frame and in practical terms, the designer’s aim turns out to be
promoting democratic spaces where different and conflicting voices and
perspectives may be expressed, and where activities and institutions are
implemented to mediate, mitigate and solve controversies (Björgvinsson *et
al.*, 2012). These spaces are social spaces. This means that they are both
physical and abstract: they can be squares, streets, neighbourhoods, as
well as intangible gathering places that work as arenas for questions and
possibilities. This way, designers contribute to a resilient society in
which diversity, redundancy, and experimentation make society itself able
to cope with challenges without collapsing (Manzini and Till, 2015).

The mediation among different and conflicting voices, the experimental and
on-going trait of these spaces move the designer’s focus of action.
Designers have to set up, to enable and to nurture them: designers have to
focus more on the process than the project. This means focus on
infrastructuring (Karasti, 2014): the ongoing and open process involving
the anticipation of future scenarios and the alignment of heterogeneous
socio-technical elements, which shall support the emergence of such
scenarios. Focusing on the process that allows a context change through
different projects leads to the idea of having a metadesign approach.
Actually, even if metadesign is a concept subjected to several different
interpretations that are welcome in this call, we focus here on one of its
most commonly shared features: the idea of developing a design process of
the design process itself.

Considering the core interest of *Strategic Design Research Journal*, in
this special issue, we welcome contributions – conceptual analysis, case
studies or empirical findings – that critically engage with one (or more)
of the provocative questions raised here:

   -

   How do Strategic Design, Participatory Design and infrastructuring
   relate to each other in conceptual or practical terms?
   -

   How does the infrastructuring process, as defined above, critically
   challenge the scope of Strategic Design?
   -

   If metadesign suggests “to defer some design and participation until
   after the design project, and opens up for use as design, design at use
   time or ‘design-after-design’” (Ehn, 2008), then how does the design
   process change the implications of its actions and the level in which it
   operate? At what level does the designer think and act? What is the
   relation between metadesign and infrastructuring?
   -

   In relationship to the key attention that Participatory Design and open
   design projects pay to the relational dimension, how does infrastructuring
   enter, contribute to or benefit from metadesign?
   -

   Which kind of interactions among citizens, local forces and public
   institutions does the designer stimulate to promote and feed collaborative
   ecosystems that support public democratic spaces? Which are the challenges
   and how could they be minimized by specific applications of the Strategic
   and Participatory Design approaches?

*References*

   1.

   BJÖRGVISSON, E.; EHN, P.; HILLGREN, P.A. 2012. Design Things and Design
   Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges. *Design Issues*,
   *28*(3):101-116.
   2.

   DISALVO, C. 2010. Design, democracy and agonistic pluralism. In*:*
Proceedings
   of the Design Research Society International Conference, Montreal
   University, Montreal. *Proceedings.* Available at:
   http://www.drs2010.umontreal.ca/data/PDF/031.pdf
   3.

   EHN, P. 2008 Participation in Design Things. In*:* Participatory Design
   Conference, 2008, Bloomington, Indiana. *Proceedings.*Bloomington, ACM
   Press, p. 92-101.
   4.

   MANZINI, E. 2014. Design in a changing, connected world. *Strategic
   Design Research Journal*, *7*(2):95-99.Available at:
   http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/sdrj/issue/view/487
   5.

   MANZINI, E.; TILL, J. (eds.). 2015. The cultures of resilience base
   text. *In:* E. MANZINI; J. TILL, *Cultures of Resilience**. Ideas. A
   Project from across the University of the Arts London*. London, Hato
   Press. p. 11-13. Available at:
   http://www.culturesofresilience.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/CoR-Booklet-forHomePrinting.pdf
   6.

   RIZZO, F.; DESERTI, A.; COBANLI, O. 2015. Design and social innovation
   for the development of Huma Smart Cities. *In:* Nordes 2015, Stockholm,
   2015. *Proceedings.* Nordes, p. 1-8. Available at:
   http://www.nordes.org/opj/index.php/n13/article/view/383/362

*Schedule*

*Full Paper Due: January 31**st**, 2016*
Notification of Review Results: March 31st, 2016
Final Version of Paper Due: May 31st, 2016
Notification of Acceptance: June 30th, 2016
*Special Issue Publication Date: August 31**st**, 2016*


*Submission of Papers*

   -

   Manuscripts must be prepared using the guidelines found at the
   *Submission* page (*
   <http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/sdrj/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions>http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/sdrj/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions
   <http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/sdrj/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions>*
   ).


   -

   For this special issue, the manuscript must be written in *English*.


   -

   Previously published articles will not be accepted. Submitted articles
   *must* *not be under consideration* for publication *anywhere else*. The
   publication of the article is subjected to the previous approval of the
   journal's Editorial Board, as well as to peer review made by, at least, two
   ad hoc reviewers using the double blind review process.


   -

   Manuscripts must be sent through the online submission system. You have
   to register in order to send your article:*
   <http://revistas.unisinos.br/sdrj>http://revistas.unisinos.br/sdrj
   <http://revistas.unisinos.br/sdrj>*

If you have questions, contact us: *[log in to unmask]
<[log in to unmask]>*




-- 
*Chiara Del Gaudio*
Pesquisadora do Programa Pós-Graduação em Design
Escola da Indústria Criativa - UNISINOS
Rua Luiz Manoel Gonzaga, 744 - Três Figueiras
90470-280 Porto Alegre (RS) - Brasil
tel: + 55 51 3591 1122 - 3769
fax: + 55 51 3591 1204
e-mail: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>


-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------