> On 16 Sep 2015, at 13:57, Oddy, Nicholas <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> The lifesaver backward glance is an essential, but even moreso when cyclists insist on hugging the kerb and therefore have to spend their time swerving into motor traffic to avoid drain covers, litter, bus wheel ripple and whatever, when they really hardly have time to look at the road ahead. The first thing that is necessary in terms of education in urban contexts is to have cyclists encouraged to cycle to take up a lane space where two lanes are available, and to hold the centre of the lane wherever there is limited clearance, (particularly taking account of door-swing from parked vehicles), letting a following motor vehicle pass when the cyclist deems it safe, rather than leaving it to the whim and judgement of whoever is driving the vehicle. The problem with all this is that it requires a holistic approach to legislation, education and road user attitude that is sadly lacking in the context of the UK's divisive approach to vehicle types.
>
> Nicholas Oddy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cycling and Society Research Group discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dave Holladay
> Sent: 16 September 2015 10:09
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: / HGV fatals - Aggregation of Marginal Gains?
>
> The result of the survey was a local safety campaign about learning how to look back when riding a bike (Ian do find that poster!) as this was considered the key safety campaign detail to promote with cyclists.
>
> Raising standards and competence for road awareness for all road users may have a far greater impact than all gizmos for roads safety.... discuss?
>
> DH
>
>> On 16/09/2015 09:54, Deegan Brian wrote:
>> Thanks Dave I will start reading before sending the request to our behaviour change team.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Dave Holladay
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 09:49 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Re: / HGV fatals - Aggregation of Marginal Gains?
>>
>> We have the results of a 5000 cyclist survey which would appear to be
>> a reasonably robust sample to a direct question about looking back
>> over their right shoulder, where a significantly different response
>> came from female respondents.
>>
>> A match-test came from reviewing incidents where a cyclist came into
>> conflict/collision with a following road user by moving right without
>> rearward observation, and this also seemed to correlate to a
>> significantly higher number of women behaving in this way.
>>
>> So the survey and observations align.
>>
>> Your sample may well have been a higher % of regular and experienced
>> cycle users who may not have observed a huge lack of rearward
>> awareness in the mass cycling traffic on the street - of all genders
>> and ethnicities? <ducks>
>>
>> Pag 16 Oxcam report (free download)
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>> On 16/09/2015 09:04, Deegan Brian wrote:
>>> Hello Dave and all, I tested your women don't look back over their right shoulder theory at the cycle show yesterday with several female cyclists. All had the same puzzled look and several now assume I am sexist. I think I am filling this alongside gay people can't whistle and black people can't swim in my unfounded things to never share in public box. At least until I see some empirical evidence.
>>>
>>> Brian
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Katja Leyendecker [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 08:35 AM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Subject: Re: / HGV fatals - Aggregation of Marginal Gains?
>>>
>>> Which location (city, country) are we talking about when saying "Most infrastructure design has it completel the wrong way round"
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Kat
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>>> On 16 Sep 2015, at 07:35, Dave Holladay <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Simon
>>>>
>>>> Your pointers to Suchman and Paul Richards
>>>>
>>>> "Most infrastructure design has it completely the wrong way round - it is expected that ideal design (often copied from a manual ) will be occupied by more and more cyclists who will use it according to the rules."
>>>>
>>>> Gives a key detail to why CS2 cycle route at Bow is still fatally
>>>> flawed in the way it is addressing the management of the risk of
>>>> motor vehicle-cycle crashes
>>>>
>>>> and is a better way of expressing my comment on the core risk management system on which the system pins its safety credentials "To expect a reliable delivery of a reduction in the risk of a collision based on robust user compliance with traffic signals is supremely naieve"
>>>>
>>>> It becomes increasingly apparent that a reversion to the use of
>>>> safety systems developed over a period of 2.3bn years may serve all
>>>> road users better than a reliance most modern technologies
>>>>
>>>> Dave Holladay
>>>>
>>>>> On 16/09/2015 01:21, Simon P J Batterbury wrote:
>>>>> thanks for everybody's wishes. I'll be back. There was a full compliment of police and witnesses.
>>>>>
>>>>> following Paul Richards (anthropologist of technology or 'technography ') the problem with a pure 'infrastructure' approach to better cycling outcomes would be that it will undoubtedly be misused and adapted by local users, just as cyclists hop across kerbs at present or run the lights on great infrastructure, as they do in the Netherlands and other countries. he does not say 'perfect' technological design is impossible, only that design must recognise user behaviour much better. this is Durkheimian . this means doing those observational studies of junctions,and following cyclists about to see what they do.Also motorists.
>>>>>
>>>>> Most infrastructure design has it completel the wrong way round - it is expected that ideal design (often copied from a manual ) will be occupied by more and more cyclists who will use it according to the rules.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> referring to Suchman's work on photocpiers, whose users could not often master the buttons and the paper jams, Richards says " To remedy this situation photocopy designers wanted to change users. But Suchman tried to get the designers to accept that users were never going to operate the machine according to the book. What was needed was not to educate the users to fit the machine but to redesign the machine to respond to the way users use (or abuse) it."
>>>>>
>>>>> Richards, P. 2010. A Green Revolution from below? Retirement
>>>>> address, Wageningen University, the Netherlands.
>>>>> http://edepot.wur.nl/165231
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dr. Simon Batterbury | Associate Professor, Environmental Studies|
>>>>> Dept. of Geography | 221 Bouverie St (rm L2.33) | University of
>>>>> Melbourne, 3010 VIC,
>>>>> +61 (0)3 8344 9319 | simonpjb @ unimelb.edu.au |
>>>>> +http://www.simonbatterbury.net
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>> From: Cycling and Society Research Group discussion list
>>>>> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Alan Munro
>>>>> [[log in to unmask]]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 15 September 2015 10:12 PM
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Subject: Re: / HGV fatals - Aggregation of Marginal Gains?
>>>>>
>>>>> My sympathy too! Simon, that sounds a horrific incident. I am glad it turned out with no serious, long term injury.
>>>>>
>>>>> I must admit to be very interested, as both a researcher and cyclist in non cycling-friendly bit of Yorkshire, for an equivalent of the British Cycling's Aggregation of Marginal Gains in terms of an aggregation of things which might bring to bear to make one safer on the road? If one doesn't know the term from cycling sport, it refers to an aggregation of competitive 'gains' through innovative training, frame design, psychological help, diet etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the sense I'm thinking, it would be 'aggregation of gains' of safety on the road through a mix of behaviours, dress, position on the road, technology, etc...
>>>>>
>>>>> In terms of myself -
>>>>> Certainly, I use the 'lifesaver' from a brief flirtation with motorcycling and have found it useful.
>>>>> I also keep a very good eye on car behaviour around me as I do not believe they will actually signal their intentions.
>>>>> I have gone through the debates of high-viz with other cycling activists and do actually wear brightly-coloured things if possible. I don't care if it's a cop-out in some eyes - it has recognisable 'gains' in visibility shown in rather basic visual perception experiments (and it's why ambulances and fire-engines are painted that way).
>>>>> We could add - lights during the day? Blinking lights?
>>>>> Road style?
>>>>> Junction behaviour?
>>>>> We might also bring in innovative technological solutions. I have a colleague who has been working on interesting novel drone ideas.
>>>>>
>>>>> It might be slightly different for rural cyclists - we have to bear in mind that a lot of accidents seem to happen in rural roads.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do think infrastructure and well-designed roads are the only real solution, as well as actual enforcement of laws for motorists, and campaign for these things, but these things do not seem to be arriving soon for the majority of cyclists.
>>>>>
>>>>> alan
>>>>>
>>>>> alan munro
>>>>> www.munrobius.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 15 Sep 2015, at 12:31, David Gordon Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My sympathy and congratulations on surviving!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (I have been hit by nine motor vehicles in the US since coming
>>>>>> here from the UK).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave Wilson
>>>>>> David Gordon (Dave) Wilson
>>>>>> MIT room 3-256, 77 Massachusetts Ave.
>>>>>> CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139-4307, USA
>>>>>> Phone: 617 253 5121;
>>>>>> Email: [log in to unmask]; OR
>>>>>> 21 Winthrop Street WINCHESTER MA 01890-2851, USA; Ph.: 781 729
>>>>>> 2203;
>>>>>> Email: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Simon P J Batterbury
>>>>>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>> This is slightly raw since I am hospital after being hit on wednesday by an HGV doing 60km/h. Miraculously, after spinning through the air (the bike was destroyed under the wheels), I came out with broken ribs, delated lung, concussion and a broken leg. The accident circumstances were different ( I was at 90 degrees to the truck) and what saved me was wearing a backpack with a load of university papers and a laptop - these cushioned the blow and broke ribs , instead of worse. Doesn't safety advice say not to wear a backpack and to use panniers? I could have been dead or paralysed without it.
>>>>>>> The Lifesaver issue seems to ring true . also scannign the forward field of vision - that would have helped in my case.
>>>>>>> I am writing a cathartic blog posting and will post it, now that i am enjoying a painful but unexpected second lease of life.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dr. Simon Batterbury | Associate Professor, Environmental
>>>>>>> Studies| Dept. of Geography | 221 Bouverie St (rm L2.33) |
>>>>>>> University of Melbourne, 3010 VIC,
>>>>>>> +61 (0)3 8344 9319 | simonpjb @ unimelb.edu.au |
>>>>>>> +http://www.simonbatterbury.net
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>>>> From: Cycling and Society Research Group discussion list
>>>>>>> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Dave Holladay
>>>>>>> [[log in to unmask]]
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 15 September 2015 7:59 AM
>>>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: CSRG Manchester - Manchester new tram tracks / HGV
>>>>>>> fatals
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've a meeting in Barnsley on Wednesday, and would like to drop
>>>>>>> by en route to catch up if that's OK.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would like to see how we can tie in some known detail which seems
>>>>>>> to correlate and point to further research.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) at least 80% of HGV-cycle fatal crashes in London are
>>>>>>> initiated by an impact between the front nearside quarter of the
>>>>>>> HGV and the rear offside quarter of the cycle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2) immediately prior to an impact in this area the cyclist will
>>>>>>> be in the position of least visibility from the driving position
>>>>>>> - viz masked by the nearside A pillar, (ironically) the cluster
>>>>>>> of external mirrors placed to remove the blind spots across the
>>>>>>> front and down to the rear and side of the truck, and the entire
>>>>>>> solid panelled front nearside corner and door of the truck.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3) there are indications that the cyclists are also unaware of
>>>>>>> the approaching truck because they do not maintain good all round
>>>>>>> observation by both aural and visual checks, especially the
>>>>>>> rearward over the right shoulder visual check, which is known by
>>>>>>> motorcyclists as the Lifesaver - which pretty bluntly tells you
>>>>>>> why you need to keep doing this in busy traffic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 4) 10 years ago a robust 5000 response survey of cyclists clearly
>>>>>>> highlighted 2 points
>>>>>>> i) female respondents answered that they
>>> *********************************************************************
>>> ************** The contents of this e-mail and any attached files are
>>> confidential. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately at [log in to unmask] and remove it from your system. If received in error, please do not use, disseminate, forward, print or copy this email or its content. Transport for London excludes any warranty and any liability as to the quality or accuracy of the contents of this email and any attached files.
>>>
>>> Transport for London is a statutory corporation whose principal
>>> office is at Windsor House, 42-50 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0TL.
>>> Further information about Transport for London’s subsidiary companies
>>> can be found on the following link:
>>> http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/about-tfl/
>>>
>>> Although TfL have scanned this email (including attachments) for viruses, recipients are advised to carry out their own virus check before opening any attachments, as TfL accepts no liability for any loss, or damage which may be caused by viruses.
>>> *********************************************************************
>>> **************