Can you say where the assumptions are implemented? - I am using different tissue classes and may need to look at customizing those parts.

Thanks


From: John Ashburner [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 9:35 PM
To: Richard Beare
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SPM] Something different about tissue class 5 in spm12 tissue classification??

I'd suggest disabling the "cleanup" and setting the MRF parameter to 0.  There are some custom options that make various assumptions about the interpretations of the different tissue classes.

Best regards,
-John


On 7 August 2015 at 10:33, Richard Beare <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the spm12 version of what used to be called "new segment" with a non standard template (neonate template, 9 tissue classes) on T2 images. Everything functions as expected with spm 8, however there is some strange behaviour with spm12 that I'm trying to track down. The issue is a region of misclassification, in csf near the bottom of the brain stem. That area gets misclassified as tissue class 5, irrespective of what tissue class 5 is. In the original template class 5 is the hippocampus, but if I switch classes 1 (cortical GM) and 5, then the misclassification is as cortical GM. There is nothing unusual about the patch of csf that gets misclassified that I can find. It is not unusually bright or unusually dark. It is certainly more similar to the rest of the csf than the class it gets misclassified as.

I recall reading somewhere that there is something special to do with the eyes in spm12, but I haven't been able to track down differences in code between spm8 and spm12 that might account for the difference in behaviour. Is there some special hidden option of hard coding that makes class 5 behave differently?

Any advice appreciated.
Thanks

Richard Beare
Developmental Imaging
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Melbourne
Australia.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

If you have any questions, please contact MCRI IT Servicedesk for further assistance.
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________