Good morning all,
I'm looking for a selection of views on the issue of how fine grained people are when considering what information falls into an exemption.
Example - Subject has made a SAR for all information about them held as part of a record of a complaint they made. Bob is redacting a series of emails that falls in that scope and Bill is reviewing Bob's work.
Bob has redacted the entire contents of some emails under DPA Sch.7 s.10 (negotiations), but left in the header and footer, From:, To:, etc.
Bill says that the header and footer falls under the exemption as well.
I know what I think, but what are your thoughts? Also, how fine grained do you tend to go when redacting? To the email, the paragraph, the line or down to the word?
Thoughts on or off the list much appreciated, thanks.
Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap
Complaints, Mediation & Information Officer
Nottinghamshire County Council
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
