You'd need to determine if the first slice is 1 or 2, this is scanner and sequence dependent. Then you'd use: [1:2:35 2:2:35] or [2:2:35 1:2:35] or the reverse orders if the last slices were collected first. Best Regards, Donald McLaren ================= D.G. McLaren, Ph.D. Research Fellow, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Postdoctoral Research Fellow, GRECC, Bedford VA Website: http://www.martinos.org/~mclaren Office: (773) 406-2464 ===================== This e-mail contains CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION which may contain PROTECTED HEALTHCARE INFORMATION and may also be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED and which is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of the e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are in possession of confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail unintentionally, please immediately notify the sender via telephone at (773) 406-2464 or email. On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:23 AM, NUML engg <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Dear all, > > If my slice scan order is "interleaved" and number of slices are 35 then > in which order I will put my slices for slice time correction in SPM. > > Can I put in reverse order as in SPM manual. [ 35 : -1 : 1 ] > > Thanks > > Regards > > NUML >