Hi,
My apologies for riding on this thread and what seems to be a really hot topic. I'd like to get some relevant advice as well.
Anderson, you mentioned that the -D option can cause problems for the comparison of 3 or more groups. In that case, if I were to be comparing e.g. FA between disease subtype 1 vs. disease subtype 2 vs. control, I would probably not be selecting the -D option? Despite all the posts I have read, unfortunately there is quite a cloud of confusion surrounding the usage of the -D option, especially to someone who is not as experienced such as myself.
Some other questions:
1. If I have matched all 3 groups on age and gender, I am assuming based on what I read, that it is also advisable to add age and gender as covariates?
In that case, would -D be needed, or should I forget about using -D and simply manually demean both covariates?
2. Assuming the above is done for my first TBSS run. However, after looking at the results, perhaps postdoc revealed significant differences between disease subtype 1 vs. disease subtype 2. Moving forward, I now decide I would like to control for other factors like illness duration and medication dosage, just between those two groups (as this is probably irrelevant to the control group). Do I now run a 2nd TBSS with just the two disease subtype groups and add the extra covariates (demeaned)?
Would greatly appreciate some clear advice on the above. Many thanks in advance for your time and effort :-)